dc.contributor.author
Bernbeck, Reinhard
dc.date.accessioned
2019-09-26T08:02:46Z
dc.date.available
2019-09-26T08:02:46Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/25649
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-25412
dc.description.abstract
In this paper, I briefly elaborate on the differences between two notions of third space, one rooted in postcolonial theory, the other in Marxist geography. Marxist geography is concerned with the production of antagonistic spatialities. I use this idea to analyze various notions of space of and in the Iranian Iron Age polity of the Medes. The main issue is the interpretation of “squatting” habitations at the two sites of Tepe Nush-i Jan and Godin Tepe. I argue that the flimsy walls set into the massive architecture of earlier levels are a sign of tensions over conflictual spatialities.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Marxist geography
en
dc.subject
Median empire
en
dc.subject.ddc
900 Geschichte und Geografie::900 Geschichte::900 Geschichte und Geografie
dc.title
Squatting’ in the Iron Age
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dc.title.subtitle
an Example of Third Space in Archaeology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.17171/4-8-1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
eTopoi. Journal for Ancient Studies
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
20
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://journal.topoi.org/index.php/etopoi/article/view/287
refubium.affiliation
Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften
refubium.affiliation
Topoi
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
2192-2608