Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with a rupture of the Achilles tendon (ATR) treated percutaneously with the Dresden instrument in the hands of surgeons others than its inventors. Materials and methods: 118 patients (FU rate: 77.1%) with an acute ATR treated with the Dresden instrument were retrospectively evaluated. The following data were evaluated: pain intensity, functional limitation, Hannover score, Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS), AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, Tegner activity score, complications, maximum calf circumference (MCC) on both sides, and the Matles test for tendon lengthening. The effect of the time point of the surgery after trauma was examined. Results: Hannover scores and ATRSs were good; AOFAS scores were excellent. Almost all patients returned to sporting activities postoperatively, and 66.1% were able to return to their previous level. The Tegner activity score revealed a slight posttraumatic decrease (p=0.009) in the level of physical activity overall (pre-injury: 5.370.15; postoperatively: 4.77 +/- 0.15). The re-rupture rate was 2%. No sural nerve lesions and no infections were reported. Even after 3years, there was still a difference in MCC that was correlated with inferior clinical score and AT lengthening. Patients treated within the first 2days after ATR showed inferior clinical outcomes in terms of AOFAS score, ATRS, and functional limitations. Conclusions: Percutaneous ATR suture with the Dresden instrument is a safe and reliable method. Low complication and re-rupture rates, good clinical results, and a high rate of return to play support this fact. The time point of the operation may influence the outcome.
