dc.contributor.author
Manegold, Sebastian
dc.contributor.author
Tsitsilonis, Serafim
dc.contributor.author
Schumann, Jakob
dc.contributor.author
Gehlen, Tobias
dc.contributor.author
Agres, Alison N.
dc.contributor.author
Keller, Johannes
dc.contributor.author
Gesslein, Markus
dc.contributor.author
Wichlas, Florian
dc.date.accessioned
2019-04-01T12:19:44Z
dc.date.available
2019-04-01T12:19:44Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/24247
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-2019
dc.description.abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with a rupture of the Achilles tendon (ATR) treated percutaneously with the Dresden instrument in the hands of surgeons others than its inventors. Materials and methods: 118 patients (FU rate: 77.1%) with an acute ATR treated with the Dresden instrument were retrospectively evaluated. The following data were evaluated: pain intensity, functional limitation, Hannover score, Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS), AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, Tegner activity score, complications, maximum calf circumference (MCC) on both sides, and the Matles test for tendon lengthening. The effect of the time point of the surgery after trauma was examined. Results: Hannover scores and ATRSs were good; AOFAS scores were excellent. Almost all patients returned to sporting activities postoperatively, and 66.1% were able to return to their previous level. The Tegner activity score revealed a slight posttraumatic decrease (p=0.009) in the level of physical activity overall (pre-injury: 5.370.15; postoperatively: 4.77 +/- 0.15). The re-rupture rate was 2%. No sural nerve lesions and no infections were reported. Even after 3years, there was still a difference in MCC that was correlated with inferior clinical score and AT lengthening. Patients treated within the first 2days after ATR showed inferior clinical outcomes in terms of AOFAS score, ATRS, and functional limitations. Conclusions: Percutaneous ATR suture with the Dresden instrument is a safe and reliable method. Low complication and re-rupture rates, good clinical results, and a high rate of return to play support this fact. The time point of the operation may influence the outcome.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Achilles tendon
en
dc.subject
Percutaneous
en
dc.subject
Minimal invasive
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Functional outcome and complication rate after percutaneous suture of fresh Achilles tendon ruptures with the Dresden instrument
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
19
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s10195-018-0511-1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
SpringerOpen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
19
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
30229505
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1590-9921