dc.contributor.author
Biedenkopf, Katja
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T08:03:43Z
dc.date.available
2012-09-25
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19282
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-22942
dc.description
1\. Introduction 5 2\. Emissions Trading 6 2.1 The Idea of Emissions Trading 6
2.2 US Pioneering Efforts in the 1990s 7 2.3 The EU Taking Over Pioneership 8
2.4 Unsuccessful North American Federal Initiatives in the 2000s 8 2.5 The
Emergence of North American Subnational Emissions Trading Initiatives 9 3\.
Transfer Mechanisms and Domestic Factors 10 3.1 Transfer Mechanisms 11 3.2
Domestic Factors 12 3.3 Research Methods 14 4\. The Role of the EU ETS in
North American Initiatives 15 4.1 Triggers of the Initiatives 15 4.2 The Role
of the EU ETS and the Transfer Mechanisms 18 4.3 Contact Patterns and EU
Policy Promotion 19 4.4 Transferred Elements 20 4.5 Comparison 21 5\.
Conclusion 23 Literature 25
dc.description.abstract
This paper examines the ways in which the EU greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
trading system (ETS) affected the design of similar programs in North America.
It investigates the conditions under which EU pioneering policy can play a
role in extra-EU jurisdictions’ policy-making. The empirical investigation
finds that the EU’s promotion of emissions trading was successful to some
extent. The EU did not influence or trigger the inception of GHG emissions
trading programs in North America. The EU ETS, however, played a role in the
design process of the North American programs. Actors learned from elements of
the EU system. Domestic North American factors were the triggers and drivers
of the agenda-setting stage and dominated the policy adoption stage while the
EU ETS significantly contributed to the policy formulation processes. The EU
ETS played a role at the technical level rather than at the level of political
deliberations and decision-making. The EU’s policy promotion efforts depended
on the demand in North America. The resonance and receptiveness in North
America were decisive factors. The EU was not an importunate persuader.
Learning from the ETS was to a significant part demand-driven.
de
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000055-9
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.title
Emmissions trading
dc.title.subtitle
A transatlantic journey for an idea?
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://www.polsoz.fu-berlin.de/en/v/transformeurope/publications/working_paper/WP_45_Biedenkopf.pdf
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Kolleg-Forschergruppe "The Transformative Power of Europe"
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000014543
refubium.series.issueNumber
45
refubium.series.name
KFG working paper
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000002090
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access