dc.contributor.author
Bennett, Lance
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T07:47:34Z
dc.date.available
2012-09-25
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18714
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-22401
dc.description
1\. Introduction 5 2\. Theorizing Issue Publics in National and Transnational
Contexts 6 2.1 Who Are the Organizers of Issue Publics in Europe? 7 2.2
Rethinking the Nature of Mediated Public Spheres 8 3\. Analyzing Networked
Issue Publics in Nations and the EU 10 4\. Research Design 13 5\. Methods 15
6\. The Case of EU Fair Trade Advocacy Networks 16 6.1 Determining Whether
There is A Cross-national EU FT Network 17 6.2 Public Engagement in the EU
Networkt 18 7\. The Case of National Level FT Networks in the UK 21 7.1 Issue
Framing in the UK Network 23 7.2 Does the UK FT Network Refer to the EU? 23
7.3 Evidence of Opportunities for Direct Citizen Engagement 24 8\. The Case of
Germany 26 8.1 Issue Framing 27 8.2 EU References 29 8.3 Citizen Engagement 31
9\. Does the EU Respond to This Bottom-Up Communication? 31 10\. Conclusion:
Two Different NGO Spheres 31 Literature
dc.description.abstract
The gold standard for discussing public spheres has long been established
around mass media, with the prestige print press given a privileged place. Yet
when it comes to a European public sphere, the mass media are also
problematic, or at least incomplete, in several ways: relatively few EU-wide
issues are replicated in the national media of EU countries, the discourses on
those issues are dominated primarily by elites (with relatively few civil
society voices included in the news), and public attention is seldom paid to
EU issues beyond a select few (money, agriculture, political integration,
scandals), creating a distant ‘gallery public.’ At the same time, many
important political issues such as trade and economic justice, development
policy, environment and climate change policy, human rights, and military
interventions, among others, are being addressed more actively by networks of
civil society actors both within and across EU national borders. These
networks utilize the Internet and various interactive digital media to
publicize their issues, engage active publics, and contest competing policy
perspectives not only within specific issue networks, but across solidarity
networks involving other policy issues, and with political targets at national
and EU levels. This dimension of the EU public sphere has received relatively
little attention from observers, and when it has been explored, it is often
dismissed as less inclusive, and therefore less significant than the somewhat
reified mass media model. This analysis compares networked, digitally mediated
public issue spheres with the mass mediated model, points out ways in which
the two types of public sphere are complementary, and also shows how networked
issue spheres may be the sites of greater citizen and civil society engagement
in keeping with more classical models of public spheres.
de
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000055-9
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.title
Grounding the European public sphere
dc.title.subtitle
looking beyond the mass media to digitally mediated issue publics
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://www.polsoz.fu-berlin.de/en/v/transformeurope/publications/working_paper/WP_43_Bennett.pdf
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Kolleg-Forschergruppe "The Transformative Power of Europe"

refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000014540
refubium.series.issueNumber
43
refubium.series.name
KFG working paper
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000002088
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access