dc.contributor.author
Panke, Diana
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T07:27:27Z
dc.date.available
2010-02-03
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17995
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-21710
dc.description.abstract
This paper qualitatively explores the prospects to restore compliance with EU
law against the rigid and eminently strong resistance of the affected member
states. An empirical study of Court cases on incorrect legal transposition of
EC directives in Germany and the UK reveals that states give in to the
European prosecutors early in some cases, but maintain non-compliance for a
longer period in others. This paper demonstrates that policy variables such as
the interpretational scope of the disputed element, domestic norms, the
organizational degree of organized interests, and the strength of domestic
non-compliance constituencies influence the settlement dynamics of hard cases.
de
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000053-2
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::340 Recht
dc.title
Why the ECJ restores compliance faster in some cases than in others
dc.title.subtitle
comparing Germany and the UK
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://www.polsoz.fu-berlin.de/polwiss/forschung/international/europa/arbeitspapiere/index.html
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft / Arbeitsstelle Europäische Integration, Jean Monnet Chair
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000004777
refubium.series.issueNumber
4
refubium.series.name
Berliner Arbeitspapier zur Europäischen Integration
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000000865
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access