dc.contributor.author
Boon, Errol
dc.date.accessioned
2025-10-09T06:22:09Z
dc.date.available
2025-10-09T06:22:09Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/49691
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-49414
dc.description.abstract
This essay explores Plato’s rudimentary epistemology of non-discursive thought. I will proceed in three steps, beginning with a general view of Plato’s philosophy, subsequently focusing on the Meno, and ending with a close reading of the passages on music in Republic. In the first section, I will outline a general framework to examine the relation between truth (alētheia) and discourse (logos) in Plato’s philosophy. My central argument is that, for Plato, discourse is a necessary yet not sufficient condition for truth. Accordingly, I identify two sides of Plato’s philosophy: his “logocentric” project, which aims to demonstrate the necessity of discourse in truth-finding, and his “logoskeptic” project, which underscores the insufficiency of discourse in truth-finding. This double philosophical undertaking, then, raises the question of how both aspects—discourse’s necessity and its insufficiency—relate to each other in a combined extra-discursive pursuit of truth. In the subsequent two sections, I will focus on two Platonic dialogues to characterize the relation between logoskepticism and logocentrism as a dialectical circle. First, I will analyze this relation through a reading of the Meno, in particular the aporia of the ‘‘paradox of inquiry”. This interpretation aims both to solidify the general framework presented in the previous section and to introduce the notion of “dialectics” to conceptualize the relation between one’s discourse and that which transcends one’s discursive abilities. In the Meno, I argue, this dialectic unfolds as a circular mode of thinking in which a form of passivity ultimately proves decisive. However, in the Meno, the dialectical mode of thought remains largely confined to the realm of discursivity, leaving unresolved the question of how discourse and the non-discursive might collaborate in a similarly dialectical yet extra-discursive mode of reason. Finally, in the third section, I argue that a close reading of the passages on music in Book III of the Republic (398b–403c) reveals an insight into the dialectical relation between discursive and non-discursive reason. Throughout these passages, Plato launches a paradoxical theory of musical pedagogy. In short, Plato makes a case for the cognitive value of music’s non-discursive nature, while simultaneously explaining this non-discursive quality in a thoroughly logocentric manner. Much of the scholarship on Plato’s philosophy of music tends to emphasize only one side of this paradox. However, I contend that by recognizing both contrasting aspects of Plato’s musical pedagogy, by preserving rather than resolving their circular relation to each other, we can see how discourse and non-discursive material interact dialectically in music. In doing so, I aim to show how Plato’s paradoxical theory of music bridges two key aspects of his overall philosophy, namely discourse’s necessity and its insufficiency in the pursuit of truth.
en
dc.format.extent
24 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
discursivity
en
dc.subject
Seventh Letter
en
dc.subject
Ancient philosophy
en
dc.subject
Non-discursive
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophy and psychology::180 Ancient, medieval, Oriental philosophy::184 Platonic philosophy
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophy and psychology::120 Epistemology (Theory of knowledge)::121 Epistemology (Theory of knowledge)
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophy and psychology::100 Philosophy::101 Theory of philosophy
dc.title
Plato’s Circle of Words and Tones
dc.title.subtitle
On the Dialectic Between Logos and Music in the Pursuit of Truth
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.booktitle
Meter and Music in Ancient Greece
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.editor
John Robert Bagby, Ronald Blankenborg and Jurgen R. Gatt
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Parnassos Press
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplace
Syracusa, Italy
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
191
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
214
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.32942752.12
refubium.affiliation
Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eisbn
978-1-942495-80-2