Introduction: The aim of the study was two evaluate the effectiveness of a Peyton teaching approach for rotary root canal instrumentation, in comparison to the traditional “see one–do one” method. Material and Methods: Forty undergraduate students were randomly divided into two groups (n = 20). Students of the first group (G1) were taught how to use rotary instrumentation using a modified Peyton method, whilst the second group (G2) watched a teaching video (30 min) on the same subject. Both groups instrumented a plastic block and subsequently both mesial canals of an extracted lower molar. The quality of the root canal instrumentation was analysed by 2 blinded observers on video recordings and x-rays. Results: Interobserver correlation was 0.917 (p < .0005; Pearson) for the assessment of the video recordings; students of G1 received significantly more total points (83.55 ± 6.82 points) compared to G2 (69.76 ± 13.82) (p = .001; t-test), the gender had no significant effect on the overall results (p = .444; two-way ANOVA). Significant differences were detected for the categories “initial scouting,” “coronal enlargement,” “glide path preparation,” “preparation using X2 file,” “preparation using X3 file” (p < .05; t-test) as well as for the subcategories “sequence of rinse, recapitulation, rinse” (p = .001; t-test) and “recapitulation” (p < .002; t-test). No differences between groups were observed for the radiographic evaluation with respect to working length and canal straightening. Conclusion: Teaching rotary instrumentation by using the Peyton approach resulted in improved performance of undergraduate students assessed with a checklist-based process analysis. Enhanced implementation of rotary instrumentation could result in better long-term results of students' root canal treatment.
