dc.contributor.author
Hnila, Pavol
dc.contributor.author
Frahm, Ellery
dc.contributor.author
Gilibert, Alessandra
dc.contributor.author
Bobokhyan, Arsen
dc.date.accessioned
2025-02-04T08:15:18Z
dc.date.available
2025-02-04T08:15:18Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/46470
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-46183
dc.description.abstract
Traditionally, reliable obsidian sourcing requires expensive calibration standards and extensive geological reference collections as well as experience with statistical processing. In the South Caucasus — one of the most obsidian-rich regions on the planet — this combination of requirements has often restricted sourcing studies because few projects have geological reference collections that cover all known obsidian sources. To test an alternative approach, we conducted “open sourcing” using portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) analyses of geological specimens with three key changes to the conventional method: (1) commercially available calibration standards were replaced with a loanable Peabody-Yale Reference Obsidians (PYRO) set, (2) a comprehensive geological reference collection was replaced with a published dataset of consensus values (Frahm, 2023a, 2023b), and (3) processing in statistical packages was replaced with two semiautomated machine-learning workflows available online. For comparison, we used classification by-eye with JMP 17.2 statistical software. Furthermore, we propose a new method to evaluate calibrations, which streamlines comparisons and which we refer to as a symmetric difference ratio (SDR). The results of this feasibility study demonstrate that this “open sourcing” workflow is reliable, yet currently only in combination with classification by-eye. When the consensus values were combined with the machine-learning solutions, the classification results were unsatisfactory. The most encouraging aspect of our alternative “open sourcing” workflow is that it enables correct source identification without physically measuring reference collections, therefore surmounting an obstacle that, until now, has severely limited archaeological research. We anticipate that rapid developments in machine-learning will also soon improve the workflow.
en
dc.format.extent
56 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
pXRF analysis
en
dc.subject
Calibration assessment
en
dc.subject
Trendline comparisons
en
dc.subject
Peabody-Yale Reference Obsidians (PYRO)
en
dc.subject
SourceXplorer
en
dc.subject
AutoML for geochemistry
en
dc.subject.ddc
900 Geschichte und Geografie::930 Geschichte des Altertums (bis ca. 499), Archäologie::930 Geschichte des Altertums bis ca. 499, Archäologie
dc.title
“Open Sourcing” Workflow and Machine Learning Approaches for Attributing Obsidian Artifacts to Their Volcanic Origins: A Feasibility Study from the South Caucasus
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
28
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s10816-025-09695-8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
32
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-025-09695-8
refubium.affiliation
Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Altorientalistik
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1573-7764