dc.contributor.author
Mertz, Marcel
dc.contributor.author
Hetzel, Tatiana
dc.contributor.author
Alex, Karla
dc.contributor.author
Braun, Katharina
dc.contributor.author
Camenzind, Samuel
dc.contributor.author
Dodaro, Rita
dc.contributor.author
Jörgensen, Svea
dc.contributor.author
Linder, Erich
dc.contributor.author
Capas-Peneda, Sara
dc.contributor.author
Reihs, Eva Ingeborg
dc.contributor.author
Tiwari, Vini
dc.contributor.author
Todorović, Zorana
dc.contributor.author
Kahrass, Hannes
dc.contributor.author
Selter, Felicitas
dc.date.accessioned
2024-10-17T15:07:21Z
dc.date.available
2024-10-17T15:07:21Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/45315
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-45027
dc.description.abstract
Can nonhuman animals be used for the benefit of humans in a scientifically and morally justified manner and, if yes, how? Based on our own experiences as scholars from various academic backgrounds, we argue that this question can only be answered as an interdisciplinary and international endeavor, considering insights from research ethics and animal ethics as well as scientific and legal aspects. The aim of this article is to contribute to the foundation of the emerging field of animal research ethics. In doing so, we describe the following seven phases of animal research experiments: ethical, legal and social presumptions (phase 0), planning (phase I), review (phase II), conduct of experiments (phase III), publication/dissemination (phase IV), further exploitation of results (phase V), and evaluation (phase VI). In total, 20 key ethical, legal, and practical challenges that an ethical framework for the use of animals in research needs to address are identified and analyzed. Finally, we characterize the following four meta-challenges and opportunities associated with animal research ethics as a field: (1) moral pluralism, (2) the integration of views and positions outside the laboratory, (3) international plurality of conduct, standards, and legal norms, and (4) interdisciplinary education.
en
dc.format.extent
28 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
animal experimentation
en
dc.subject
animal ethics
en
dc.subject
animal ethics committees
en
dc.subject
harm–benefit analysis
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::170 Ethik::170 Ethik
dc.title
Interdisciplinary Animal Research Ethics - Challenges, Opportunities, and Perspectives
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
2896
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/ani14192896
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Animals
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
19
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
14
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192896
refubium.affiliation
Rechtswissenschaft
refubium.affiliation
Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2076-2615