dc.contributor.author
Raharinirina, Nomenjanahary Alexia
dc.contributor.author
Sunkara, Vikram
dc.contributor.author
Kleist, Max von
dc.contributor.author
Fackeldey, Konstantin
dc.contributor.author
Weber, Marcus
dc.date.accessioned
2024-07-04T12:45:51Z
dc.date.available
2024-07-04T12:45:51Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/44132
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-43842
dc.description.abstract
The joint analysis of two datasets and that describe the same phenomena (e.g. the cellular state), but measure disjoint sets of variables (e.g. mRNA vs. protein levels) is currently challenging. Traditional methods typically analyze single interaction patterns such as variance or covariance. However, problem-tailored external knowledge may contain multiple different information about the interaction between the measured variables. We introduce MIASA, a holistic framework for the joint analysis of multiple different variables. It consists of assembling multiple different information such as similarity vs. association, expressed in terms of interaction-scores or distances, for subsequent clustering/classification. In addition, our framework includes a novel qualitative Euclidean embedding method (qEE-Transition) which enables using Euclidean-distance/vector-based clustering/classification methods on datasets that have a non-Euclidean-based interaction structure. As an alternative to conventional optimization-based multidimensional scaling methods which are prone to uncertainties, our qEE-Transition generates a new vector representation for each element of the dataset union in a common Euclidean space while strictly preserving the original ordering of the assembled interaction-distances. To demonstrate our work, we applied the framework to three types of simulated datasets: samples from families of distributions, samples from correlated random variables, and time-courses of statistical moments for three different types of stochastic two-gene interaction models. We then compared different clustering methods with vs. without the qEE-Transition. For all examples, we found that the qEE-Transition followed by Ward clustering had superior performance compared to non-agglomerative clustering methods but had a varied performance against ultrametric-based agglomerative methods. We also tested the qEE-Transition followed by supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods and found promising results, however, more work is needed for optimal parametrization of these methods. As a future perspective, our framework points to the importance of more developments and validation of distance-distribution models aiming to capture multiple-complex interactions between different variables.
en
dc.format.extent
26 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Machine learning
en
dc.subject
Gene regulation
en
dc.subject
Normal distribution
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::510 Mathematik::510 Mathematik
dc.title
Multi-Input data ASsembly for joint Analysis (MIASA): A framework for the joint analysis of disjoint sets of variables
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
e0302425
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pone.0302425
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
PLoS ONE
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
19
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302425
refubium.affiliation
Mathematik und Informatik
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Mathematik

refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin finanziert.
de
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1932-6203
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert