dc.contributor.author
Fürstenberg, Roland
dc.contributor.author
Meemken, Diana
dc.contributor.author
Langforth, Susann
dc.contributor.author
Grosse-Kleimann, Julia
dc.contributor.author
Kreienbrock, Lothar
dc.contributor.author
Langkabel, Nina
dc.date.accessioned
2024-02-22T09:14:51Z
dc.date.available
2024-02-22T09:14:51Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/41966
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-41689
dc.description.abstract
A practical and representative sampling method for microbiological examination of the slaughter process is useful for identifying abattoir-specific risk factors within the pig slaughter line. The aim of this study was to examine the suitability of an agar contact method (ACM), where the agar was homogenized before the microbiological processing, in comparison with the wet-dry double swabbing method (WDSM) for quantitative determination of total viable counts (TVC) on pig skin surfaces. In our experimental trial, pig skin pieces were artificially contaminated at 2 levels (3 log and 7 log cfu/ml) with a suspension of bacteria species commonly found on pig skin and cultivated in vitro. Within our field trial, pig carcasses were investigated at pre-chilling in an abattoir under standard processing conditions. For both sampling methods, TVC was determined, and statistical equivalence tests were calculated. Linear regression models showed the similarity of the sampling methods, with coefficient of determination (R2) > 90% and slope parameters of nearly 1 for both trials separately. Statistically significant equivalence between the 2 sampling methods was proven in both trials (with p < 0.0001 within an equivalence range of ± 0.5 log cfu/ml, respectively). The field trial revealed TVC on carcass surfaces sometimes at or below the lower detection limit for the ACM, while TVC from all carcasses were able to be determined by WDSM. Overall, low contamination levels were less reliably detectable by ACM than by WDSM. The ACM can be seen as an additional and suitable sampling procedure for pig skin and can contribute to the identification of abattoir specific risk factors for investigations of the hygienic status at process stages along the pig slaughter line.
en
dc.format.extent
8 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Artificial contamination
en
dc.subject
Microbiological load
en
dc.subject
Experimental trial
en
dc.subject
Agar contact plates
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::630 Landwirtschaft::630 Landwirtschaft und verwandte Bereiche
dc.title
Comparison of the agar contact method and the wet-dry double swabbing method for determining the total viable bacterial count on pig carcass surfaces
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00003-023-01473-6
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
41
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
48
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
19
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-023-01473-6
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Lebensmittelsicherheit und -hygiene
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1661-5867