dc.contributor.author
Marín-Aguilera, Beatriz
dc.date.accessioned
2023-08-09T10:01:10Z
dc.date.available
2023-08-21T10:01:10Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/40542
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-40262
dc.description.abstract
Archaeology is indeed one of the whitest disciplines. In the report American Archaeologist carried out by the Society for American Archaeology (SAA), 89% of respondents identified themselves as having European ancestry, i.e. being white (Zeder 1997: 13). More recently, the 2020 Profiling the Profession report states that 97% of archaeologists in the UK are white (Aitchison et al. 2021). There are no official data for the European Association of Archaeologists (EAA), but I surmise a similar percentage of white people. There are only few initiatives whose work has been crucial to truly diversify ethnicity within the discipline, namely the Society of Black Archaeologists (SBA) and the Indigenous Archaeologist Collective (IAC) in the US and the European Society of Black and Allies Archaeologies (ESBAA).
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc
900 Geschichte und Geografie::900 Geschichte::901 Geschichtsphilosophie, Geschichtstheorie
dc.title
Archaeology as Necessarily Political
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Forum Kritische Archäologie
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
12 (2023)
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
36
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
43
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://www.kritischearchaeologie.de
refubium.affiliation
Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
2194-346X