dc.contributor.author
Perlitz, Benjamin
dc.contributor.author
Slagman, Anna
dc.contributor.author
Hitzek, Jennifer
dc.contributor.author
Riedlinger, Dorothee
dc.contributor.author
Möckel, Martin
dc.date.accessioned
2022-11-04T16:07:42Z
dc.date.available
2022-11-04T16:07:42Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36723
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-36436
dc.description.abstract
Background: Seasonal influenza is a burden for emergency departments (ED). The aim of this study was to investigate whether point-of-care (POC) PCR testing can be used to reduce staff sick days and improve diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate whether point-of-care (POC) PCR testing can be used to reduce staff sick days and improve diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
Methods: Using a cross-over design, the cobas (R) Liat (R) Influenza A/B POC PCR test (Liat) was compared with standard clinical practice during the 2019/2020 influenza season. All adult patients (aged >= 18 years) with fever (>= 38 degrees C) and respiratory symptoms were included. Primary end points were the prevalence of influenza infections in the ED and staff sick days. Secondary end points were frequency of antiviral and antibacterial therapy, time between admission and test result or treatment initiation, patient disposition, ED length of stay (LOS), and for inpatients mortality and LOS. Nurses were interviewed about handling and integration of POC testing. The occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infections coincided with the second half of the study. Results A total of 828 patients were enrolled in the study. All 375 patients of the intervention group were tested with Liat, and 103 patients of them (27.6%) tested positive. During the intervention period, staff sick days were reduced by 34.4% (P = .023). Significantly, more patients in the intervention group received antiviral therapy with neuraminidase inhibitors (7.2% vs 3.8%, P = .028) and tested patients received antibiotics more frequently (40.0% vs 31.6%, P = .033). Patients with POC test were transferred to external hospitals significantly more often (5.6% vs 1.3%, P = .01).
Conclusion: We conclude that POC testing for influenza is useful in the ED, especially if it is heavily frequented by patients with respiratory symptoms.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
emergency department
en
dc.subject
point-of-care testing
en
dc.subject
polymerase chain reaction
en
dc.subject
staff protection
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Point‐of‐care testing for influenza in a university emergency department: A prospective study
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1111/irv.12857
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Wiley
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
608
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
617
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
15
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
33817983
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1750-2640
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1750-2659