dc.contributor.author
Dißmann, L.
dc.contributor.author
Heinicke, J.
dc.contributor.author
Jensen, K. Charlotte
dc.contributor.author
Amon, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Hoffmann, G.
dc.date.accessioned
2022-11-30T12:33:49Z
dc.date.available
2022-11-30T12:33:49Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36327
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-36043
dc.description.abstract
Respiration rate (RR) is a proficient indicator to measure the health status of cattle. The common method of measurement is to count the number of respiratory cycles each minute based on flank movements. However, there is no consistent method of execution. In previous studies, various methods have been described, including counting flank movements for 15 s, 30 s or 60 s as well as stopping the time for 5 or 10 breaths. We assume that the accuracy of the aforementioned methods differs. Therefore, we compared their precision with an RR sensor, which was used as the reference method in this study. Five scientists from the fields of agricultural science and veterinary medicine quantified the flank movement according to each of the five methods mentioned above. The results showed that with an average RR of 30 breaths per minute (bpm), all methods showed a high correlation to the values of the RR sensor. However, counting breaths for 60 s had the highest level of conformity with the RR sensor (Lin`s concordance correlation coefficient: 0.96) regardless of the level of RR. With rising RR, the inaccuracy increased significantly for the other four investigated methods, especially when counting 5 and 10 breaths. Therefore, we would recommend that counting for 60 s should be used as the standard method for future studies due to its high precision regardless of the level of RR.
en
dc.format.extent
5 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Respiration rate
en
dc.subject
Respiration rate sensor
en
dc.subject
Flank movement
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::630 Landwirtschaft::630 Landwirtschaft und verwandte Bereiche
dc.title
How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle?
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s11259-022-09984-7
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Veterinary Research Communications
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
1221
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
1225
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
46
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-09984-7
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Veterinär-Epidemiologie und Biometrie
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Tier- und Umwelthygiene
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1573-7446
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert