dc.contributor.author
Thiele, Kathi
dc.contributor.author
König, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Kerschbaum, Maximilian
dc.contributor.author
Hedgecock, Jon
dc.contributor.author
Paksoy, Alp
dc.contributor.author
Scheibel, Markus
dc.contributor.author
Gerhardt, Christian
dc.date.accessioned
2022-08-24T12:07:54Z
dc.date.available
2022-08-24T12:07:54Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36007
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35722
dc.description.abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and complication spectrum after delayed repair surgery of distal biceps tendon ruptures, postulating that satisfactory results are possible contrary to previous literature.
Methods: Forty-three of 92 patients with a full workup (= OPT in) undergoing primary distal biceps tendon repair were included in this study. The mean age of participants was 49.5 years (range = 22-66 years). This cohort was divided into two groups: patients undergoing acute repair (<21 days = AR group) and a group with delayed intervention (>21 days = SR group). Beside clinical evaluation, functional scores and detection of heterotopic ossification were documented. Strength of flexion and supination were measured using a BIODEX multipoint system. In addition, thirty-one patients were included only in the evaluation of complications in the absence of consent for clinical examination (= OPT out).
Results: Concerning the OPT-in group, twenty-eight patients (ø age = 48.9 years; 22-63 years) received acute repair after an average of 9.2 ± 3.7 days. On the contrary, 15 patients (ø age = 50.5 years; 32-66 years) were treated with a delay after an average of 31.4 ± 10.4 days. Regarding patient-reported outcome measures, conflicting results emerge (AR/SR: Subjective Elbow Value = 87/80%, P > .05; Mayo score = 96/93 pts, P > .05; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score = 6/13 pts, P < .05; and Oxford Elbow Score = 44/39 pts, P < .05). The main complication is the paresthesia of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, which occurs more in the group of delayed repair (AR: 21.0%, SR 31.8%). Forty-one percentage of patients in the SR group described pain in the elbow with exertion in contrast to 17.3% in the AR group. In terms of elbow strength, no significant difference in the AR or SR group compared with the contralateral side could be observed.
Conclusion: The data suggest that delayed repair of distal biceps ruptures beyond 3 weeks may result in satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, exertional pain and paresthesia of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve may diminish results.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
Distal biceps tendon rupture
en
dc.subject
Delayed treatment
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Clinical outcomes after refixation of subacute repaired distal biceps tendon ruptures
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1016/j.jseint.2021.12.004
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
JSES International
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Elsevier
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
523
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
529
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
6
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
35572446
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
2666-6383