dc.contributor.author
Burchardt, Dana
dc.date.accessioned
2022-11-29T14:02:46Z
dc.date.available
2022-11-29T14:02:46Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/34871
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-34591
dc.description.abstract
The notion of legal space is increasingly being used to address the challenges of multiple and overlapping spheres of legality that the notion of legal order cannot capture. This article shows how legal space can serve as an alternative (or at least complementary) concept to legal order in view of the limitations of the latter. It sketches out a notion of legal space that is inspired by topology, an approach that analyses the qualitative nature of spaces. It is concerned with understanding the ways in which legalities interact, rather than with ‘measuring’ their spatial dimensions. A topology-inspired approach to legal space can contribute to conceptualizing, in a novel manner, the inner structure of legal spaces, the boundaries of these spaces and their interrelations with other spaces. It offers an analytical toolkit for better understanding multiple legalities, providing categories to characterize sets of legal elements as well as phenomena such as overlaps and hybridity. It is conceptually less constrained than the concept of legal order, and thus allows us to address various bodies of law ranging from classical domestic law, EU law and international law to global administrative law, corporate social responsibility law, platform law and lex sportiva.
en
dc.format.extent
30 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
interlegality
en
dc.subject
legal pluralism
en
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::340 Recht::340 Recht
dc.title
The concept of legal space: A topological approach to addressing multiple legalities
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1017/S2045381722000041
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Global Constitutionalism
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
11
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381722000041
refubium.affiliation
Rechtswissenschaft
refubium.affiliation.other
Freie Universität Empirical Legal Studies Center (FUELS)
refubium.funding
Open Access in Konsortiallizenz - Cambridge
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2045-3825