dc.contributor.author
Münch, Ricarda
dc.contributor.author
Walter, Henrik
dc.contributor.author
Müller, Sabine
dc.date.accessioned
2021-01-27T13:37:05Z
dc.date.available
2021-01-27T13:37:05Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/29366
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-29112
dc.description.abstract
Generally, diseases are primarily harmful to the individual herself; harm to others may or may not be a secondary effect of diseases (e.g., in case of infectious diseases). This is also true for mental disorders. However, both ICD-10 and DSM-5 contain two diagnoses which are primarily defined by behavior harmful to others, namely Pedophilic Disorder and Antisocial (or Dissocial) Personality Disorder (ASPD or DPD). Both diagnoses have severe conceptual problems in the light of general definitions of mental disorder, like the definition in DSM-5 or Wakefield's "harmful dysfunction" model. We argue that in the diagnoses of Pedophilic Disorder and ASPD the criterion of harm to the individual is substituted by the criterion of harm to others. Furthermore, the application of the criterion of dysfunction to these two diagnoses is problematic because both heavily depend on cultural and social norms. Therefore, these two diagnoses fall outside the general disease concept and even outside the general concept of mental disorders. We discuss whether diagnoses which primarily or exclusively ground on morally wrong, socially inacceptable, or criminal behavior should be eliminated from ICD and DSM. On the one side, if harming others is a sufficient criterion of a mental disorder, the "evil" is pathologized. On the other side, there are practical reasons for keeping these diagnoses: first for having an official research frame, second for organizing and financing treatment and prevention. We argue that the criteria set of Pedophilic Disorder should be reformulated in order to make it consistent with the general definition of mental disorder in DSM-5. This diagnosis should only be applicable to individuals that are distressed or impaired by it, but not solely based on behavior harmful to others. For ASPD, we conclude that the arguments for eliminating it from the diagnostic manuals overweigh the arguments for keeping it.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
antisocial personality disorder
en
dc.subject
dissocial personality disorder
en
dc.subject
pedophilic disorder
en
dc.subject
diagnostic criteria
en
dc.subject
definition of mental disorder
en
dc.subject
harmful behavior
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Should Behavior Harmful to Others Be a Sufficient Criterion of Mental Disorders? Conceptual Problems of the Diagnoses of Antisocial Personality Disorder and Pedophilic Disorder
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
558655
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3389/fpsyt.2020.558655
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Frontiers in Psychiatry
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Frontiers Media SA
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
11
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
33093836
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1664-0640