dc.contributor.author
Dawson, Helen
dc.contributor.author
Nikolakopoulou, Irene
dc.date.accessioned
2020-10-14T12:25:09Z
dc.date.available
2020-10-14T12:25:09Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/28464
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-28214
dc.description.abstract
Interaction in Mediterranean protohistory is generally considered via the core-periphery model, with greater influence being ascribed to the complex polities of the eastern Mediterranean than to those of the Aegean and central Mediterranean. This is despite archaeological evidence attesting that they actively participated in material and cultural exchanges. In this paper, we focus on Minoan Crete and Mycenaean Greece, reflecting on their interaction
spheres and on the meaning of ‘central’ and ‘peripheral’ places. We consider two case studies: Thera and the Aeolian Islands. These islands functioned as maritime hubs in both inter-regional and regional networks. We propose a model of ‘cycles of integration’, as a more accurate and less static representation of interaction.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
core-periphery
en
dc.subject
connectivity
en
dc.subject.ddc
900 Geschichte und Geografie::930 Geschichte des Altertums (bis ca. 499), Archäologie::930 Geschichte des Altertums bis ca. 499, Archäologie
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dc.title.subtitle
Aegean Identities and Interactions in the Late Bronze Age Mediterranean
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
eTopoi
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
155
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
192
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
Special Volume 7
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://journal.topoi.org
refubium.affiliation
Topoi
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2192-2608