dc.contributor.author
Schildmann, Jan
dc.contributor.author
Bruns, Florian
dc.contributor.author
Hess, Volker
dc.contributor.author
Vollmann, Jochen
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T10:51:55Z
dc.date.available
2018-03-02T10:48:02.841Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/21237
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-24532
dc.description.abstract
Objective: “History, Theory, Ethics of Medicine” (German: “Geschichte,
Theorie, Ethik der Medizin”, abbreviation: GTE) forms part of the obligatory
curriculum for medical students in Germany since the winter semester
2003/2004. This paper presents the results of a national survey on the
contents, methods and framework of GTE teaching. Methods: Semi-structured
questionnaire dispatched in July 2014 to 38 institutions responsible for GTE
teaching. Descriptive analysis of quantitative data and content analysis of
free-text answers. Results: It was possible to collect data from 29 institutes
responsible for GTE teaching (response: 76%). There is at least one
professorial chair for GTE in 19 faculties; two professorial chairs or
professorships remained vacant at the time of the survey. The number of
students taught per academic year ranges from <100 to >350. Teaching in GTE
comprises an average of 2.18 hours per week per semester (min: 1, max: 6).
Teaching in GTE is proportionally distributed according to an arithmetic
average as follows: history: 35.4%, theory 14.7% and ethics 49.9%. Written
learning objectives were formulated for GTE in 24 faculties. The preferred
themes of teaching in history, theory or ethics which according to respondents
should be taught comprise a broad spectrum and vary. Teaching in ethics (79
from a max. of 81 possible points) is, when compared to history (61/81) and
theory (53/81), attributed the most significance for the training of medical
doctors. Conclusion: 10 years after the introduction of GTE the number of
students and the personnel resources available at the institutions vary
considerably. In light of the differences regarding the content elicited in
this study the pros and cons of heterogeneity in GTE should be discussed.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
medical history
dc.subject
medical theory
dc.subject
medical ethics
dc.subject
medical studies
dc.subject
curricula teaching
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
“History, Theory and Ethics of Medicine”: The Last Ten Years. A Survey of
Course Content, Methods and Structural Preconditions at Twenty-nine German
Medical Faculties
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
GMS J Med Educ. - 34 (2017), 2, Doc23
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3205/zma001100
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/zma/2017-34/zma001100.shtml
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.urn
urn:nbn:de:0183-zma0011002
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000029171
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer reinen Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000009498
dcterms.accessRights.dnb
free
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access