dc.contributor.author
Görlitz, Katja
dc.contributor.author
Tamm, Marcus
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T08:16:28Z
dc.date.available
2015-04-10T06:50:17.621Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19709
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/FUDOCS_document_000000022170
dc.description.abstract
This paper analyzes the returns to training that was co-financed by the German
voucher program Bildungsprämie. The estimation strategy compares outcomes of
participants in voucher training with voucher recipients who intended to
participate in training, but did not do so because of a random event like
course cancellation by the provider of training. We find no impact of voucher
training on wages, employment, job tasks and on subjective outcomes (in
particular, the risk of job loss and job satisfaction). However, there is
evidence that training participants report to better match the skill
requirements of their job.
en
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000319-4
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000006-7
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject
returns to training
dc.subject
program evaluation
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::370 Bildung und Erziehung
dc.title
The pecuniary and non-pecuniary returns to voucher-financed training
refubium.affiliation
Wirtschaftswissenschaft
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000022170
refubium.series.issueNumber
2015,11 : Economics
refubium.series.name
Diskussionsbeiträge des Fachbereichs Wirtschaftswissenschaft der Freien Universität Berlin
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000004748
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access