dc.contributor.author
Mutombo, Emilie
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T08:06:29Z
dc.date.available
2013-03-07T16:12:43.659Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19372
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-23028
dc.description.abstract
In the current context of economic and environmental crisis and the related
complexity and uncertainties, what deciders seem to expect are i.a. robust
factual evidence about the effectiveness of their policies. This call for
evidence finds an answer through Impact Assessment (IA): Regulatory Impact
Assessment (RIA), Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), Strategic
Environmental Assessment (SEA), etc.; and more lately sustainable or
integrated IA. The European Commission Impact Assessment (EC-IA) procedure is
said to be one of the most institutionalised and successful of the new IA’s
generation. This internal ex-ante integrated evaluation applies on almost all
Commission initiatives and is meant to address “all” significant economic,
social and environmental impacts of these proposals. If IA’s have widely been
studied as evidence-based tools aiming at rationalizing decision-making
contributing to the ‘Better Regulation’ objectives, some authors have
highlighted their limits as decision-support tools feeding ‘directly’
scientific knowledge into the decisions, while stressing the political effects
(intended or not) of these meta-instruments. Following such an effort to step
back from a linear approach of decision-making, we question the political
effects of the EC-IA through a cognitive approach (Muller, 2005; Radaelli and
Schmidt, 2004) wondering whether EC-IA, as meta-instrument, contributes to
diffuse a specific conception of “the environment” within European policy-
making? Indeed, the evidence-gathering process framed through EC-IA
requirements might have an impact on policy-making through this very process
of “definition” of what are significant environmental impacts, not least
because of the required quantification of the analysed impacts (as called for
in the EC-IA guidelines). Within the scope of this paper, we will present the
results of the literature review feeding into the on-going elaboration of our
theoretical and methodological framework.
de
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000168-9
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::330 Wirtschaft::333 Boden- und Energiewirtschaft
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.title
Impact Assessment and "the environment" within the European Commission
dc.type
Konferenzveröffentlichung
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft / Forschungszentrum für Umweltpolitik (FFU)
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000016740
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.series.name
Berlin Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000002377
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access