dc.contributor.author
Lütkenhorst, Wilfried
dc.contributor.author
Altenburg, Tilman
dc.contributor.author
Pegels, Anna
dc.contributor.author
Vidican, Georgeta
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T08:01:55Z
dc.date.available
2016-06-10T09:24:50.622Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19217
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-22880
dc.description.abstract
The paper in a nutshell: In this paper, we present the normative concept of
green industrial policy, which we define as encompassing any policy measure
aimed at aligning the structure of a country’s economy with the needs of
sustainable development within established planetary boundaries. We elaborate
on why we need green industrial policy, how it differs from conventional
industrial policy, why it is faced with significantly bigger challenges, and
how these can be met. What and how we produce and consume is largely shaped by
markets. However, markets fail to solve many of the environmental challenges
we are facing. Therefore, we need governments to intervene, thus reclaiming
the primacy of public policy in setting and implementing societal objectives.
While safeguarding the sustainability of human life on our planet makes green
industrial policy a highly normative undertaking, the economic case for green
industrial policy is strong as well – the success stories of such ‘green’
frontrunners as Germany and Denmark demonstrate the competitiveness potential
of the new technologies. However, as shown by decades of discussion on
industrial policy, government intervention almost invariably brings about
risks of political capture and government failure. Green industrial policy is
thus not only governed by ethical norms, but also by politics. The risks of
failure are magnified by the urgency and scale of today’s global environmental
challenges, requiring particularly bold, comprehensive and well-orchestrated
government intervention under high uncertainty. By highlighting lessons
learned from practical cases of both success and failure, we show how these
risks can be, and have been, managed. In particular, we submit that a broad-
based social vision and contract need to be forged – supported by change
coalitions and coupled with policy process safeguards, openness to policy
learning, and an alignment of green industrial policies with market
mechanisms.
en
dc.format.extent
62 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::330 Wirtschaft::333 Boden- und Energiewirtschaft
dc.title
Green Industrial Policy
dc.type
Konferenzveröffentlichung
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
2016 Berlin conference on global environmental change: transformative global
climate governance "aprés Paris", Berlin 23-24 May 2016
dc.title.subtitle
Managing Transformation under Uncertainty
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://www.berlinconference.org/2016/
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft / Forschungszentrum für Umweltpolitik (FFU)
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000024747
refubium.series.name
Berlin conference on global environmental change
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000006562
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1860-0441