dc.contributor.author
Shkaruba, Anton
dc.contributor.author
Kireyeu, Viktar
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T07:55:53Z
dc.date.available
2010-11-11
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19000
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-22674
dc.description.abstract
With environmental regimes, rapidly emerging and developing, scholars working
on the evaluation of ecosystem governance and its capacity to adapt to global
environmental change, face a challenge of accounting for the past changes of
institutional set-ups and “legacy effects” they created. These effects may
include previously taken management actions (including infrastructure
development) and formal and informal institutions developed or modified. This
is important that even if completely new governance regimes are being
emerged/introduced, the inertia of the previous set-up can be persistent, in
particular where informal institutions are strong. This problem has been
raised in the course of a larger study looking at the adaptive capacity of
forest ecosystems in Belarus. Belarus makes for an interesting case because
the country is in socio-economic transition since early 1990s, and it still
preserves the national governance, which is very much top-down and not
participatory. At the same time, the national government and NG sector closely
cooperate with international organisations and EU on a number of initiatives,
Belarus has ratified most of environmental MEAs, and the national
environmental legislation has often been developed after EU models, i.e.
multiple levels of environmental governance emerge and influence the national
policy and the implementation mechanisms. Another effect of transition is that
the conservation status of many protected areas and mandates of the management
agencies are often revised and re-formulated. To account for the legacy effect
on the adaptation capacity of institutions of ecosystem governance, we have
developed a methodological framework based on the analytical problems of the
Earth System Governance as formulated by Biermann et al (2009) (Architecture,
Agents, Allocation, Accountability, Adaptiveness) translated in a set of
operational criteria. The criteria were applied to typical institutional set-
ups associated with certain conservations categories of forest ecosystems, and
mapped nationwide.
de
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000089-6
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject
Ecosystem governance
dc.subject
Institutional change
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie::577 Ökologie
dc.title
Integration of legacy effects into evaluation of ecosystem governance
dc.type
Konferenzveröffentlichung
refubium.affiliation
Freie Universität Berlin
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft / Forschungszentrum für Umweltpolitik (FFU)
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000006971
refubium.note.author
E1: Effects of Transboundary Regimes
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.series.name
Berlin Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000001350
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access