dc.contributor.author
Engel, Paul G. H.
dc.contributor.author
Knaepen, Hanne
dc.contributor.author
Engel, Karen E.
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T07:42:43Z
dc.date.available
2016-08-09T10:19:51.471Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18552
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-22247
dc.description.abstract
Communities facing the effects of climate change are actively trying to boost
their resilience. At the same time, governments are mainstreaming climate
change into their development frameworks. Close examination of current
practice, however, points at a disconnect between government policy and
community initiatives. This study explores how strengthening specific
capabilities at various levels can ensure synchronization of policy and
practice and further community resilience in face of climate change. Choosing
an approach that appreciates the interplay of top-‐down and bottom-‐up
logics towards performance under stress, it illust rates that understanding
resilience in terms of capacity opens the door to practical thinking on
policies as well as practices. Evidence is taken from case studies in Chile
and Vietnam to show how governments can play an enabling role when connecting
their efforts to initiatives taken by communities. At the same time,
top-‐down structures, such as the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), can help
to break silos between different (inter)national political agendas and
underscore the need to link top-‐down and bottom-‐up approaches to ensure
resilience. This paper contends that improving communities' adaptive capacity
demands bridging the disconnect between multiple levels of policy and
practice. In doing so, different, and too often conflicting, values,
interests, and political agendas need to be aligned. Moreconcretely, we found
that resilience, as an emergent property of human systems, can be enhanced
when government and local stakeholders work together in a number of specific
areas. For instance, combining multi-‐stakeholder platforms in which diverse
actors – ranging from policy-‐makers to researchers to community
representatives – translate lessons learned at the community level intolocal
and national policy, with initiatives aimed at strengthening capacitiesand
ensuring access to relevant assets at the community level.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::330 Wirtschaft::333 Boden- und Energiewirtschaft
dc.title
Community resilience in the face of climate change
dc.type
Konferenzveröffentlichung
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
2016 Berlin conference on global environmental change: transformative global
climate governance "aprés Paris", Berlin 23-24 May 2016
dc.title.subtitle
challenges to multi-level capacity building
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://www.berlinconference.org/
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft / Forschungszentrum für Umweltpolitik (FFU)
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000024717
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.series.name
Berlin conference on global environmental change
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000006802
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access