dc.contributor.author
Persson, Åsa
dc.contributor.author
Hall, Nina
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T07:27:16Z
dc.date.available
2016-06-22T10:33:43.777Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17991
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-21707
dc.description.abstract
In the last decade there has been a significant shift in the framing of
climate governance. The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has
moved from an explicit focus on mitigation, to also include adaptation.
Climate change is no longer simply about reducing emissions but also about
enabling countries to deal with its impacts – be it on development, migration,
or health. Yet most studies of the climate regime have focused on the
evolution of mitigation governance, not adaptation. This tendency is partly
because adaptation was considered a ‘taboo’ topic in the UNFCCC as many states
did not want to concede that climate change was occurring, or did not want it
to be considered a substitute for mitigation. In short, global adaptation
governance is understudied and poorly conceptualized. In this paper, we ask:
what constitutes and characterizes global adaptation governance? We attempt to
characterize governance efforts in terms of what, who and how adaptation is
governed. We examine: the constituent parts of an emerging regime (principles,
norms, rules, decision-making procedures), the institutions involved, and how
these parts have been manifested in concrete modes of governance (standards
and commitments, operations, finance, knowledge and networking). To aid this
mapping, we use the mitigation regime as a heuristic for comparison. We find
that there is indeed an emerging global regime around adaptation, although
characterized by ‘soft’ procedural and facilitative modes of governance.
Furthermore the institutional complexity and fragmentation we see in global
adaptation governance arises for different reasons than for the mitigation
regime. Namely the epistemic ambiguity around adaptation, including its scalar
framing, and the power politics around controlling donor funds for adaptation.
This paper contributes to our understanding of the shift in framing of global
climate governance, from mitigation to adaptation, and the coherence of this
regime.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject
global governance
dc.subject
climate change
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::330 Wirtschaft::333 Boden- und Energiewirtschaft
dc.title
Global climate adaptation governance
dc.type
Konferenzveröffentlichung
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
2016 Berlin conference on global environmental change: transformative global
climate governance "aprés Paris", Berlin 23-24 May 2016
dc.title.subtitle
what is governed and why?
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://www.berlinconference.org/2016/
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft / Forschungszentrum für Umweltpolitik (FFU)

refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000024868
refubium.series.name
Berlin conference on global environmental change
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000006659
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access