dc.contributor.author
Wong, G. Y.
dc.contributor.author
Loft, L.
dc.contributor.author
Brockhaus, M.
dc.contributor.author
Yang, A. L.
dc.contributor.author
Pham, T. T.
dc.contributor.author
Assembe-Mvondo, S.
dc.contributor.author
Luttrell, C
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T07:25:06Z
dc.date.available
2016-06-09T09:07:41.486Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17901
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-21621
dc.description.abstract
Policy instruments for implementing the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation
and Forest Degradation and the enhancement of forest carbon stocks (REDD+)
mechanism operate within an orchestra of national contexts and policy mixes
that affect the forest and other land sectors. How will policymakers choose
between the myriad of options for distributing REDD+ benefits, and be able to
evaluate its potential effectiveness, efficiency and equity (3Es) within the
various institutional and governance structures a where such a REDD+ benefit
sharing mechanism is situated? This is a pressing issue given the results-
based aspect of REDD+. We present here a three-element assessment framework
for evaluating outcomes and performance of REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms,
using the criteria of effectiveness, efficiency and equity: (1) the structures
(objective and policies) of a REDD+ benefit sharing mechanism; (2) the broader
institutional and policy contexts underlying forest governance; and (3)
outcomes of REDD+ including emissions reductions, ecosystem service provision
and poverty alleviation. A strength of the assessment framework is its
flexible design to incorporate indicators relevant to different contexts; this
helps to generate a shared working understanding of what is to be evaluated in
the different REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms (BSMs) across complex socio-
political contexts. In applying the framework to case studies, the assessment
highlights trade-offs among the 3Es, and the need to better manage access to
information, monitoring and evaluation, consideration of local perceptions of
equity and inclusive decision-making processes. The framework aims not to
simplify complexity but rather, serves to identify actionable ways forward
towards a more efficient, effective and equitable implementation and re-
evaluation of REDD+ BSMs as part of reflexive policymaking.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject
benefit sharing mechanisms
dc.subject
assessment framework
dc.subject
incentive based policy instruments
dc.subject
efficiency and equity
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::330 Wirtschaft::333 Boden- und Energiewirtschaft
dc.title
An assessment framework for REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms within a forest
policy mix
dc.type
Konferenzveröffentlichung
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
2016 Berlin conference on global environmental change: transformative global
climate governance "aprés Paris", Berlin 23-24 May 2016
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://www.berlinconference.org/2016/
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft / Forschungszentrum für Umweltpolitik (FFU)
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000024723
refubium.series.name
Berlin conference on global environmental change
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000006539
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access