dc.contributor.author
Chen, Zhao
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T07:23:49Z
dc.date.available
2016-01-27T10:07:44.819Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17868
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-21588
dc.description.abstract
Global governance is an ambiguous concept. Based on the generalization and
summary of the definition and theory of global governance, this article
identifies the lack of regional features of global governance studies in the
present literature. Building a framework based on comparative politics, the
author conducts a comparative study of the EU and China on the models of
global governance, and summarizes three types of global governance concepts:
constitutionalism based on human rights, hegemonic liberalism and
egalitarianism based on sovereignty. In the end, it looks ahead to the
developing trends of global governance, in the future. Read Working Paper
en
dc.format.extent
22 Seiten
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000266-1
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft::327 Internationale Beziehungen
dc.title
A comparative study of global governance models of the EU and China
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000023803
refubium.series.issueNumber
13.2014
refubium.series.name
NFG Working Paper Series
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000005911
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access