dc.contributor.author
Cent, Joanna
dc.contributor.author
Mertens, Cordula
dc.contributor.author
Niedzialkowski, Krzysztof
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T07:23:21Z
dc.date.available
2010-11-11
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17852
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-21572
dc.description.abstract
With their accession to the EU in 2004, Poland and Hungary had to implement
the Natura 2000 programme for biodiversity protection. In both countries NGOs
have been active throughout the implementation process. Forms and outcomes of
NGO involvement, however, differed. Hungarian NGOs were very influential
during the site designation phase, working closely with the governmental
authorities and contributing considerably to the country’s site proposal. In
Poland, the form of NGO’s involvement changed from opposition towards the
government (publication of a Natura 2000 shadow list) to close cooperation
with public institutions, resulting in a significant expansion of site
designations. This paper analyses the role and impact of NGOs on Natura 2000
implementation in Poland and Hungary and seeks explanation for the observed
differences with reference to the theoretical background of policy networks
and advocacy coalitions. The qualitative data used for the study is based on
in-depth interviews with NGOs representatives and officials of public
institutions engaged in Natura 2000 implementation. The comparison shows that
the existing architecture of the sector of biodiversity governance is decisive
for NGO activities and determines their role and impact. In the European
multilevel governance setting new formal and informal opportunities were given
to NGOs. In both countries NGOs became stronger during the Natura 2000
process. We argue that this was a result of the establishment of multi-level
policy networks between the European Commission, NGOs and public institutions,
based on resource dependencies. These networks were powerful enough to
overcome dominating policy patterns in both countries. The differences found
between Hungary and Poland could be explained by different discoursive
positions of the responsible ministries. The change of government in Poland in
2007 shifted the discourse towards supporting conservation, which enabled the
formation of an advocacy coalition between the government and NGOs.
de
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000089-6
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject
Policy networks
dc.subject
advocacy coalitions
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
dc.title
A love match, a resource match, a good match?
dc.type
Konferenzveröffentlichung
dc.description.edition
Draft version
dc.title.subtitle
comparison of the role of NGOs in Natura 2000 implementation in Poland and
Hungary ; influence, outcomes and future prospects for Natura 2000 maintenance
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft / Forschungszentrum für Umweltpolitik (FFU)
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000006897
refubium.note.author
A5: Enabling Non-State-Actors
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.series.name
Berlin Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000001292
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access