dc.contributor.author
Jansen, Jacques
dc.contributor.author
Adelle, Camilla
dc.contributor.author
Crimi, Jacopo
dc.contributor.author
Dick, Jan
dc.contributor.author
Helming, Katharina
dc.contributor.author
Jacob, Klaus
dc.contributor.author
Janssen, Sander
dc.contributor.author
Jordan, Andrew
dc.contributor.author
Podhora, Aranka
dc.contributor.author
Reis, Stefan
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T07:21:54Z
dc.date.available
2013-04-11
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17791
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-21517
dc.description.abstract
Impact Assessment (IA) intends to collect evidence on the likely impacts of
new policies and thereby minimize unwanted side-effects and maximize the
benefits to society. Although it is a requirement in the EC and all OECD
countries, the scope and methods vary considerably. Governments have invested
considerably in research to support the evidence basis of policy making for
sustainable development. However, the general picture shows a gap between the
proliferation of IA tools from the scientific community and their actual use
in the policy process. The FP7 network of excellence LIAISE (www.liaise-
noe.eu) is designed to identify the causes for non-use of IA tools and bridge
the gaps between researchers with a generally strong orientation towards their
(disciplinary) peers and practitioners who tend to focus on their policy
domain and policy problems. LIAISE aims at: 1) understanding of the policy
process and the resulting needs for IA knowledge and IA tools; 2) description
of IA tools and scientific IA expertise in a standardised way; 3) a shared IA
toolbox targeted at the needs of both researchers and practitioners; 4) a
shared IA research agenda integrating scientific knowledge gaps and the
priorities for the development of new IA knowledge that arise from the future
policy agenda; and 5) safeguarding the project results beyond the period of
project funding, by developing an institutional setting and a business plan
that facilitate the extension of the present consortium towards a broad centre
of IA expertise with a structural permanence. A lively interaction between the
different communities involved, is essential to realize these objectives. The
Berlin Conference is an important opportunity to inform external research
groups about the LIAISE approach to bridging the gap between science and
policy. Their feedback and views on possible next steps in the further
integration of the IA research community are highly valued, as well as their
interest to become involved in this process.
de
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000122-8
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject
science-policy interface
dc.subject
research agenda
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.title
The LIAISE approach for co-designing knowledge on impact assessment tools
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
LIAISE - Linking Impact Assessment Instruments to Sustainability
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000017324
refubium.note.author
Weitere Autoren: Onno Roosenschoon, Sanna-Riikka Saarela, Tarja Söderman, John
Turnpenny, Sabine Weiland, Jan-Erik Wien
refubium.series.name
LIAISE Working Paper
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000002492
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access