dc.contributor.author
Kadow, Christopher
dc.contributor.author
Illing, Sebastian
dc.contributor.author
Kunst, Oliver
dc.contributor.author
Rust, Henning W.
dc.contributor.author
Pohlmann, Holger
dc.contributor.author
Müller, Wolfgang A.
dc.contributor.author
Cubasch, Ulrich
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T03:56:13Z
dc.date.available
2015-08-31T11:57:06.597Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/16257
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-20441
dc.description.abstract
We present the evaluation of temperature and precipitation forecasts obtained
with the MiKlip decadal climate prediction system. These decadal hindcast
experiments are verified with respect to the accuracy of the ensemble mean and
the ensemble spread as a representative for the forecast uncertainty. The
skill assessment follows the verification framework already used by the
decadal prediction community, but enhanced with additional evaluation
techniques like the logarithmic ensemble spread score. The core of the MiKlip
system is the coupled Max Planck Institute Earth System Model. An ensemble of
10 members is initialized annually with ocean and atmosphere reanalyses of the
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. For assessing the effect
of the initialization, we compare these predictions to uninitialized climate
projections with the same model system. Initialization improves the accuracy
of temperature and precipitation forecasts in year 1, particularly in the
Pacific region. The ensemble spread well represents the forecast uncertainty
in lead year 1, except in the tropics. This estimate of prediction skill
creates confidence in the respective 2014 forecasts, which depict less
precipitation in the tropics and a warming almost everywhere. However, large
cooling patterns appear in the Northern Hemisphere, the Pacific South America
and the Southern Ocean. Forecasts for 2015 to 2022 show even warmer
temperatures than for 2014, especially over the continents. The evaluation of
lead years 2 to 9 for temperature shows skill globally with the exception of
the eastern Pacific. The ensemble spread can again be used as an estimate of
the forecast uncertainty in many regions: It improves over the tropics
compared to lead year 1. Due to a reduction of the conditional bias, the
decadal predictions of the initialized system gain skill in the accuracy
compared to the uninitialized simulations in the lead years 2 to 9.
Furthermore, we show that increasing the ensemble size improves the MiKlip
decadal climate prediction system for all lead years.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
dc.subject
Decadal Prediction
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::550 Geowissenschaften, Geologie::551 Geologie, Hydrologie, Meteorologie
dc.title
Evaluation of forecasts by accuracy and spread in the MiKlip decadal climate prediction system
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
Meteorologische Zeitschrift (Jun 17, 2015)
dc.identifier.sepid
45899
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1127/metz/2015/0639
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2015/0639
refubium.affiliation
Geowissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Meteorologie
refubium.funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000022902
refubium.note.author
Gefördert durch die DFG und den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der Freien
Universität Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000005264
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access