dc.contributor.author
Koschek, Katharina
dc.contributor.author
Durmaz, Vedat
dc.contributor.author
Krylova, Oxana
dc.contributor.author
Wieczorek, Marek
dc.contributor.author
Gupta, Shilpi
dc.contributor.author
Richter, Martin
dc.contributor.author
Bujotzek, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Fischer, Christina
dc.contributor.author
Haag, Rainer
dc.contributor.author
Freund, Christian
dc.contributor.author
Weber, Marcus
dc.contributor.author
Rademann, Jörg
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T03:04:23Z
dc.date.available
2015-06-25T12:17:58.074Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/14453
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-18646
dc.description.abstract
Three polymers, poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) (pHPMA), hyperbranched
polyglycerol (hPG), and dextran were investigated as carriers for multivalent
ligands targeting the adaptive tandem WW-domain of formin-binding protein
(FBP21). Polymer carriers were conjugated with 3–9 copies of the proline-rich
decapeptide GPPPRGPPPR-NH2 (P1). Binding of the obtained peptide–polymer
conjugates to the tandem WW-domain was investigated employing isothermal
titration calorimetry (ITC) to determine the binding affinity, the enthalpic
and entropic contributions to free binding energy, and the stoichiometry of
binding for all peptide–polymer conjugates. Binding affinities of all
multivalent ligands were in the µM range, strongly amplified compared to the
monovalent ligand P1 with a KD > 1 mM. In addition, concise differences were
observed, pHPMA and hPG carriers showed moderate affinity and bound 2.3–2.8
peptides per protein binding site resulting in the formation of aggregates.
Dextran-based conjugates displayed affinities down to 1.2 µM, forming
complexes with low stoichiometry, and no precipitation. Experimental results
were compared with parameters obtained from molecular dynamics simulations in
order to understand the observed differences between the three carrier
materials. In summary, the more rigid and condensed peptide–polymer conjugates
based on the dextran scaffold seem to be superior to induce multivalent
binding and to increase affinity, while the more flexible and dendritic
polymers, pHPMA and hPG are suitable to induce crosslinking upon binding.
de
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
dc.subject
inhibitors of protein–protein interactions
dc.subject
isothermal titration calorimetry
dc.subject
peptide–polymer conjugates
dc.subject
proline-rich peptide sequences
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::540 Chemie
dc.title
Peptide–polymer ligands for a tandem WW-domain, an adaptive multivalent
protein–protein interaction: lessons on the thermodynamic fitness of flexible
ligands
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. - 11 (2015), S. 837–847
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3762/bjoc.11.93
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/single/articleFullText.htm?publicId=1860-5397-11-93
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000022700
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000005102
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access