dc.contributor.author
Bartig, Susanne
dc.contributor.author
Siegert, Manuel
dc.contributor.author
Liebig, Stefan
dc.contributor.author
Hövener, Claudia
dc.contributor.author
Michalski, Niels
dc.date.accessioned
2026-01-22T08:17:04Z
dc.date.available
2026-01-22T08:17:04Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/51232
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-50959
dc.description.abstract
OP 25: Exclusion and Discrimination 3, B207 (FCSH), September 4, 2025, 14:45 - 15:45
Aim
Understanding the underlying mechanisms for differences in COVID-19 vaccine uptake between migrants and non-migrants is crucial in order to design targeted interventions encouraging vaccination. This study examined to what extent vaccine disparities were mediated by psychological factors using the established 5C model of vaccine behaviour (Confidence, Complacency, Constraints, Calculation, Collective Responsibility).
Methods
Data were obtained from the German study “Corona Monitoring Nationwide”(11/2021-02/2022). The association between COVID-19 vaccination and migration history considering the psychological factors was investigated using multivariable binary logistic regressions, while controlling for various sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. A decomposition (KHB method) was conducted to examine how much of the disparities in vaccine uptake could be explained by the 5C framework.
Results
People who immigrated themselves were less likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19 compared to non-migrants, especially participants from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. The decomposition analysis showed that almost two thirds of the disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake between migrants and non-migrants were mediated by the psychological factors. Confidence in safety of the vaccine was the most relevant explanatory factor in the 5C framework. The results highlighted the importance of a differentiated consideration regarding the country of origin: While 19.4% of the effect for the MENA region is explained by the 5C model, the proportion for Eastern Europe is 73.5%, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms for the lower uptake in the MENA group still need to be identified.
Conclusion
Given our results showed the key explanatory factor of vaccine behaviour was confidence, there is a need for proactive health communication strategies to improve knowledge about and trust in vaccinations within the heterogeneous group of migrants. In addition, more in-depth research is needed with a health equity focus to explore the effect of structural inequities on the psychological factors of vaccine behaviour.
en
dc.format.extent
1 Seite
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie::301 Soziologie, Anthropologie
dc.title
342 Differences in COVID-19 vaccination among migrants and non-migrants in Germany: the mediating role of psychological factors of vaccination
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
ckaf180.167
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1093/eurpub/ckaf180.167
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
European Journal of Public Health
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
Supplement_6
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
35
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf180.167
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Soziologie

refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1464-360X
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert