dc.contributor.author
Merle, Roswitha
dc.contributor.author
Feuer, Leonie
dc.contributor.author
Frenzer, Katharina
dc.contributor.author
Plenio, Jan-Lukas
dc.contributor.author
Bethe, Astrid
dc.contributor.author
Sarnino, Nunzio
dc.contributor.author
Lübke-Becker, Antina
dc.contributor.author
Bäumer, Wolfgang
dc.date.accessioned
2025-12-01T10:09:59Z
dc.date.available
2025-12-01T10:09:59Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/50524
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-50251
dc.description.abstract
Background/Objectives: A mandatory monitoring of the use of antibiotics in horses in the European Union will come into force from 2027 on. The aim of the study was to explore the potential implementation of a monitoring system and to provide an overview of antibiotic use in horses in Germany. Methods: Data on all consultations from 57 German practices between 2018 and 2023 were obtained. The dataset included basic data about the horse, free-text diagnoses (allocated to one of 20 categories), and treatments. Information on the administered or dispensed pharmaceutical product was recorded for antibiotic treatment consultations. Results: This study analyzed 225,622 consultations with more than 50,000 horses. Antibiotics were administered in around 7% of consultations, but practice-specific rates varied considerably. Treatment was most frequent in ophthalmology cases. The most commonly used drug classes were sulfonamides combined with trimethoprim and aminopenicillins. Horses receiving antibiotics required follow-up visits more often than untreated animals, and changes in antibiotic substance occurred occasionally. Conclusions: Routine practice data provide valuable insights into antibiotic use in equine medicine. While incomplete entries and imprecise details (e.g., missing concentrations or diagnoses) remain a limitation, the approach offers clear advantages: it is cost-effective, allows large-scale data collection, and supports continuous monitoring over time. Such systems can be used to evaluate the effects of upcoming EU regulations and to identify priorities for antibiotic stewardship in equine practice.
en
dc.format.extent
16 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
antimicrobials
en
dc.subject
critically important antimicrobials
en
dc.subject
antibiotics monitoring
en
dc.subject
equine medicine
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::615 Pharmakologie, Therapeutik
dc.title
Antibiotic Use in Horses: Analysis of 57 German Veterinary Practices (2018–2023)
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
953
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/antibiotics14090953
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Antibiotics
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
9
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
14
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090953
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Veterinär-Epidemiologie und Biometrie

refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie

refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Mikrobiologie und Tierseuchen

refubium.note.author
Gefördert aus Open-Access-Mitteln der Freien Universität Berlin.
de
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2079-6382