dc.contributor.author
Obbarius, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Klapproth, Christoph Paul
dc.contributor.author
Liegl, Gregor
dc.contributor.author
Christmann, Paula M.
dc.contributor.author
Schneider, Udo
dc.contributor.author
Fischer, Felix
dc.contributor.author
Rose, Matthias
dc.date.accessioned
2025-11-12T15:24:03Z
dc.date.available
2025-11-12T15:24:03Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/50302
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-50028
dc.description.abstract
Purpose
To calibrate the item parameters of the German PROMIS® Pain interference (PROMIS PI) items using an item-response theory (IRT) model and investigate psychometric properties of the item bank.
Methods
Forty items of the PROMIS PI item bank were collected in a convenience sample of 660 patients, which were recruited during inpatient rheumatological treatment or outpatient psychosomatic medicine visits in Germany. Unidimensionality, monotonicity, and local independence were tested as required for IRT analyses. Unidimensionality was examined using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Unidimensional and bifactor graded-response IRT models were fitted to the data. Bifactor indices were used to investigate whether multidimensionality would lead to biased scores. To evaluate convergent and discriminant validity, the item bank was correlated with legacy pain instruments. Potential differential item functioning (DIF) was examined for gender, age, and subsample. To investigate whether U.S. item parameters may be used to derive T-scores in German patients, T-scores based on previously published U.S. and newly estimated German item parameters were compared with each other after adjusting for sample specific differences.
Results
All items were sufficiently unidimensional, locally independent, and monotonic. Whereas the fit of the unidimensional IRT model was not acceptable, a bifactor IRT model demonstrated acceptable fit. Explained common variance and Omega hierarchical suggested that using the unidimensional model would not lead to biased scores. One item demonstrated DIF between subsamples. High correlations with legacy pain instruments supported construct validity of the item bank. T-scores based on U.S. and German item parameters were similar suggesting that U.S. parameters could be used in German samples.
Conclusion
The German PROMIS PI item bank proved to be a clinically valid and precise instrument for assessing pain interference in patients with chronic conditions.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
pain interference
en
dc.subject
item-response theory
en
dc.subject
differential item functioning
en
dc.subject
health-related quality of life
en
dc.subject
rheumatology
en
dc.subject
psychosomatic medicine
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Measuring PROMIS pain interference in German patients with chronic conditions: calibration, validation, and cross-cultural use of item parameters
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s11136-023-03446-6
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Quality of Life Research
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
10
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
2839
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
2852
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
32
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
37268754
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0962-9343
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1573-2649