Purpose While gram negative (GN) periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) have previously been described as difficult to treat pathogens with high rates of reinfection, limited investigations have addressed midterm outcomes and risk of infection persistence by the same pathogen. This study analyzed (1) baseline demographics, treatment strategy, and midterm outcomes of GN PJIs, as well as (2) differences in reinfection and relapse rates compared to gram positive (GP) PJIs.
Methods We identified 29 patients that were revised for 30 GN PJIs of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) between 2010 and 2020 using a university-based hip registry. Mean age was 77 years, 63% were females (19), and mean BMI was 27 kg/m2. Major causative pathogens included Escherichia coli (12), Klebsiella pneumoniae (5), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5), and Enterobacter cloacae complex (5). Mean follow-up was 3.5 years. Study outcomes included (1) Kaplan–Meier survivorship analyses of all 30 GN PJIs, and (2) comparison of 18 two-stage exchanges for GN PJIs and 104 two-stage exchanges for GP PJIs, performed during the time from 2013 to 2017.
Results (1) The 5-year survivorship free of recurrent PJI was 69%, and there were 7 recurrent PJIs at a mean of 2 years. There were 2 further suprafascial wound infections, resulting in a 61% survivorship free of any infection at 5-years. At a mean of 2 years, there were 7 patients with reinfection by the same GN pathogen (6 PJIs, one wound infection) as at index revision (23%). (2) Following two-stage exchange, the 5-year survivorship free of recurrent PJI (GN: 74%; GP: 91%; p = 0.072), any infection (GN: 61%; GP: 91%; p = 0.001), and reinfection by the same pathogen was significantly lower among GN PJIs (GN: 73%; GP: 98%; p < 0.001).
Conclusions Patients revised for GN PJIs are at increased risk of reinfection as opposed to GP infections. Affected patients must be counseled on the exceptionally high risk of infection persistence with one in four developing relapses.
Level of evidence Therapeutic Level III.
