dc.contributor.author
Steffen, Claudius
dc.contributor.author
Soares, Ana Prates
dc.contributor.author
Heintzelmann, Thelma
dc.contributor.author
Fischer, Heilwig
dc.contributor.author
Voss, Jan Oliver
dc.contributor.author
Nahles, Susanne
dc.contributor.author
Wüster, Jonas
dc.contributor.author
Koerdt, Steffen
dc.contributor.author
Heiland, Max
dc.contributor.author
Rendenbach, Carsten
dc.date.accessioned
2025-09-18T11:40:20Z
dc.date.available
2025-09-18T11:40:20Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/49422
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-49144
dc.description.abstract
Background Mechanical and morphological factors have both been described to influence the rate of pseudarthrosis in mandibular reconstruction. By minimizing mechanical confounders, the present study aims to evaluate the impact of bone origin at the intersegmental gap on osseous union.Methods Patients were screened retrospectively for undergoing multi-segment fibula free flap reconstruction of the mandible including the anterior part of the mandible and osteosynthesis using patient-specific 3D-printed titanium reconstruction plates. Percentage changes in bone volume and width at the bone interface between the fibula/fibula and fibula/mandible at the anterior intersegmental gaps within the same patient were determined using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Additionally, representative samples of the intersegmental zones were assessed histologically and using micro-computed tomography (mu CT).Results The bone interface (p = 0.223) did not significantly impact the change in bone volume at the intersegmental gap. Radiotherapy (p < 0.001), time between CBCT scans (p = 0.006) and wound healing disorders (p = 0.005) were independent risk factors for osseous non-union. Preliminary analysis of the microstructure of the intersegmental bone did not indicate morphological differences between fibula-fibula and fibula-mandible intersegmental bones.Conclusions The bone interface at the intersegmental gap in mandibular reconstruction did not influence long-term bone healing significantly. Mechanical and clinical properties seem to be more relevant for surgical success.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Mandibular reconstruction
en
dc.subject
Pseudarthrosis
en
dc.subject
Cone-beam computed tomography
en
dc.subject
Surgical flaps
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Impact of the adjacent bone on pseudarthrosis in mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flaps
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
43
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s13005-023-00389-8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Head & Face Medicine
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
19
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
37784107
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1746-160X