dc.contributor.author
Kuschick, Doreen
dc.contributor.author
Dierks, Marius Tibor
dc.contributor.author
Grittner, Ulrike
dc.contributor.author
Heintze, Christoph
dc.contributor.author
Kümpel, Lisa
dc.contributor.author
Riens, Burgi
dc.contributor.author
Rost, Liliana
dc.contributor.author
Schmidt, Konrad
dc.contributor.author
Schulze, Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Toutaoui, Kahina
dc.contributor.author
Wolf, Florian
dc.contributor.author
Döpfmer, Susanne
dc.date.accessioned
2025-09-17T10:46:57Z
dc.date.available
2025-09-17T10:46:57Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/49370
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-49092
dc.description.abstract
Introduction Various developments result in increasing workloads in general practices. New models of care and a restructuring of the division of tasks could provide relief. One approach is to extend the delegation of medical tasks from general practitioners (GPs) to medical practice assistants (MPAs). So far, there has been a lack of information about specific situations in which patients are willing to be treated exclusively by MPAs.MethodsIn three German federal states, patients who visited a general practice were surveyed exploratively and cross-sectionally with a self-designed, paper-based questionnaire. The data were analysed descriptively and multivariate. A mixed binary logistic regression model was calculated to account for cluster effects at practice level (random intercept model). The dependent variable was patients' acceptance of task delegation.ResultsA total of 1861 questionnaires from 61 general practices were included in the analysis. Regarding the current problem/request, a total of 30% of respondents could imagine being treated only by MPAs. Regarding theoretical reasons for consultation, more than half of the patients agreed to be treated by MPAs. According to the regression model, MPAs were preferred when patients were younger (10-year OR = 0.84, 95%-CI [0.75, 0.93]) or had a less complicated issue (OR = 0.44, 95%-CI [0.26, 0.8]). For four current problems/requests ("acute complaints" OR = 0.27, 95%-CI [0.17, 0.45], "routine health check" OR = 0.48, 95%-CI [0.3, 0.79], "new problem" OR = 0.13, 95%-CI [0.06, 0.28], "known problem" OR = 0.16, 95%-CI [0.1, 0.27]) patients prefer to be treated by GPs instead of MPAs.DiscussionFor the first time, statements could be made on patients' acceptance of task delegation in relation to current and theoretical reasons for treatment in general practices in Germany. The discrepancy in response behaviour on a theoretical and individual level could be explained by different contexts of questions and differences at practice level. Overall, patients seem to be open to increased delegation of medical tasks, depending on the reason for treatment. Selection and response biases should be considered in the interpretation.ConclusionThe results are not completely opposed to an extension of task delegation. Further interventional studies could provide information on the possible effects of expansion of delegable tasks.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
General practice
en
dc.subject
General practitioner
en
dc.subject
Medical practice assistants
en
dc.subject
Patients' perspective
en
dc.subject
Questionnaire
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Patient perspective on task shifting from general practitioners to medical practice assistants – a quantitative survey in Germany
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
248
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s12875-023-02211-5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
BMC Primary Care
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
24
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
38007435
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2731-4553