dc.contributor.author
Gröschel, Jan
dc.contributor.author
Trauzeddel, Ralf-Felix
dc.contributor.author
Müller, Maximilian
dc.contributor.author
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian
dc.contributor.author
Viezzer, Darian
dc.contributor.author
Hadler, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Blaszczyk, Edyta
dc.contributor.author
Daud, Elias
dc.contributor.author
Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
dc.date.accessioned
2025-09-03T11:12:29Z
dc.date.available
2025-09-03T11:12:29Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/49066
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-48789
dc.description.abstract
Background Parametric mapping sequences in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allow for non-invasive myocardial tissue characterization. However quantitative myocardial mapping is still limited by the need for local reference values. Confounders, such as field strength, vendors and sequences, make intersite comparisons challenging. This exploratory study aims to assess whether multi-site studies that control confounding factors provide first insights whether parametric mapping values are within pre-defined tolerance ranges across scanners and sites. Methods A cohort of 20 healthy travelling volunteers was prospectively scanned at three sites with a 3 T scanner from the same vendor using the same scanning protocol and acquisition scheme. A Modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence (MOLLI) for T1 and a fast low-angle shot sequence (FLASH) for T2 were used. At one site a scan-rescan was performed to assess the intra-scanner reproducibility. All acquired T1- and T2-mappings were analyzed in a core laboratory using the same post-processing approach and software. Results After exclusion of one volunteer due to an accidentally diagnosed cardiac disease, T1- and T2-maps of 19 volunteers showed no significant differences between the 3 T sites (mean & PLUSMN; SD [95% confidence interval] for global T1 in ms: site I: 1207 & PLUSMN; 32 [1192-1222]; site II: 1207 & PLUSMN; 40 [1184-1225]; site III: 1219 & PLUSMN; 26 [1207-1232]; p = 0.067; for global T2 in ms: site I: 40 & PLUSMN; 2 [39-41]; site II: 40 & PLUSMN; 1 [39-41]; site III 39 & PLUSMN; 2 [39-41]; p = 0.543). Conclusion Parametric mapping results displayed initial hints at a sufficient similarity between sites when confounders, such as field strength, vendor diversity, acquisition schemes and post-processing analysis are harmonized. This finding needs to be confirmed in a powered clinical trial.Trial registration ISRCTN14627679 (retrospectively registered)
en
dc.subject
cardiovascular magnetic resonance
en
dc.subject
parametric mapping
en
dc.subject
reproducibility
en
dc.subject
post-processing
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Multi-site comparison of parametric T1 and T2 mapping: healthy travelling volunteers in the Berlin research network for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (BER-CMR)
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
47
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s12968-023-00954-9
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
25
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
37574535
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1097-6647