dc.contributor.author
Zhang, Lanxin
dc.contributor.author
Collins, Simon
dc.contributor.author
Fox, Julie
dc.contributor.author
Kleist, Max von
dc.date.accessioned
2025-08-29T13:07:56Z
dc.date.available
2025-08-29T13:07:56Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/48995
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-48718
dc.description.abstract
Introduction
Pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP and PEP) are important pillars of the HIV prevention portfolio to reduce the risk of acquisition just before or after HIV exposure. While PrEP efficacy has been elucidated in many randomized clinical trials, corresponding data for PEP is extremely difficult to obtain in a controlled setting. Consequently, it is almost impossible to study the impact of PEP initiation delay and duration on HIV risk reduction clinically, which would inform recommendations on PEP use.
Methods
We employ pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and viral dynamics models, along with individual factors, such as drug adherence to investigate the impact of initiation delay and PEP duration on HIV risk reduction. We evaluated PEP using two- and three-drug regimens with a TDF/FTC backbone. Moreover, we study PEP efficacy in the context of PrEP-to-PEP transitions.
Results
In our simulations, early initiation of PEP emerged as a pivotal factor for HIV risk reduction. We found that 2-drug (TDF/FTC) PEP may insufficiently protect when initiated > 1 hour post-exposure. When adding a third drug, early initiation was still a critical factor; however, over 90% efficacy could be achieved when PEP was initiated 48 hours post-exposure and taken for at least 14–28 days, depending on the efficacy of the third-drug component. When investigating PrEP-PEP transitions, we observed that preceding PrEP can (1) contribute directly to prophylactic efficacy, and (2) boost subsequent PEP efficacy by delaying initial viral dynamics and building-up drug concentrations, overall facilitating self-managed transitioning between PrEP and PEP.
Conclusions
Our study confirms the critical role of early (< 48 hours) PEP initiation, preferably with three drugs taken for 28 days. Self-start with TDF/FTC and later addition of a third drug is better than not self-starting. Furthermore, our study highlights the synergy between recent PrEP intake and PEP and may help to inform recommendations on PEP use.
en
dc.format.extent
10 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
mathematical modelling
en
dc.subject
post-exposure prophylaxis
en
dc.subject
pre-exposure prophylaxis
en
dc.subject
quantitative systems pharmacology
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::615 Pharmakologie, Therapeutik
dc.title
Modelling the impact of initiation delay, duration and prior PrEP on the efficacy of post-exposure prophylaxis containing a tenofovir/emtricitabine backbone
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
e26454
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1002/jia2.26454
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of the International AIDS Society
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
S1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
28
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.26454
refubium.affiliation
Mathematik und Informatik
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Mathematik

refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1758-2652
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert