dc.contributor.author
Denkel, Luisa A.
dc.contributor.author
Schwab, Frank
dc.contributor.author
Clausmeyer, Jörg
dc.contributor.author
Behnke, Michael
dc.contributor.author
Golembus, Jennifer
dc.contributor.author
Wolke, Solvy
dc.contributor.author
Gastmeier, Petra
dc.contributor.author
Geffers, Christine
dc.date.accessioned
2025-08-26T11:58:42Z
dc.date.available
2025-08-26T11:58:42Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/48884
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-48607
dc.description.abstract
Backgrounds Antiseptic bathing did not reduce central-line (CL) associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in intensive care units (ICU) according to a recent cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT). However, this analysis did not consider baseline infection rates. Our post-hoc analysis of this cRCT aimed to use a before-after comparison to examine the effect of daily bathing with chlorhexidine, octenidine or water and soap (control) on ICU-attributable CLABSI rates. Methods A post-hoc analysis of a multi-center cRCT was done. ICUs that did not yet perform routine antiseptic bathing were randomly assigned to one of three study groups applying daily bathing with 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated cloths, 0.08% octenidine wash mitts or water and soap (control) for 12 months. Baseline data was assessed 12 months before the intervention started when all ICUs routinely used water and soap. Poisson regression and generalised estimating equation models were applied to identify changes of CLABSI rates per 1000 CL days between intervention and baseline periods in each study group. Results The cRCT was conducted in 72 ICUs (24 per study group) including 76,139 patients in the baseline and 76,815 patients in the intervention period. In the chlorhexidine group, incidence density of CLABSI was reduced from 1.48 to 0.90 CLABSI per 1000 CL days comparing baseline versus intervention period (P = 0.0085). No reduction was observed in the octenidine group (1.26 versus 1.47 CLABSI per 1000 CL days, P = 0.8735) and the control group (1.20 versus 1.17, P = 0.3298). Adjusted incidence rate ratios (intervention versus baseline) were 0.63 (95%CI 0.46-0.87, P = 0.0172) in the chlorhexidine, 1.17 (95% CI 0.79-1.72, P = 0.5111) in the octenidine and 0.98 (95% CI 0.60-1.58, P = 0.9190) in the control group. Chlorhexidine bathing reduced CLABSI with gram-positive bacteria, mainly coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Conclusions In this post-hoc analysis of a cRCT, the application of 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated cloths reduced ICU-attributable CLABSI. This preventive effect of chlorhexidine was restricted to CLABSI caused by gram-positive pathogens (CoNS). In contrast, 0.08% octenidine wash mitts did not reduce CLABSI rates in ICUs.Trial registration Registration number DRKS00010475, registration date August 18, 2016.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
antiseptic bathing
en
dc.subject
chlorhexidine gluconate
en
dc.subject
octenidine dihydrochloride
en
dc.subject
post-hoc before-after analysis
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units before and after implementation of daily antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
55
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s13756-023-01260-w
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
12
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
37270604
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2047-2994