dc.contributor.author
Aghdassi, Seven Johannes Sam
dc.contributor.author
Goodarzi, Hengameh
dc.contributor.author
Gropmann, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Clausmeyer, Jörg
dc.contributor.author
Geffers, Christine
dc.contributor.author
Piening, Brar
dc.contributor.author
Gastmeier, Petra
dc.contributor.author
Behnke, Michael
dc.date.accessioned
2025-08-12T12:01:05Z
dc.date.available
2025-08-12T12:01:05Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/48678
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-48402
dc.description.abstract
Background Surveillance of surgical site infections (SSI) relies on access to data from various sources. Insights into the practices of German hospitals conducting SSI surveillance and their information technology (IT) infrastructures are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate current SSI surveillance practices in German hospitals with a focus on employed IT infrastructures.Methods German surgical departments actively participating in the national SSI surveillance module "OP-KISS" were invited in August 2020 to participate in a questionnaire-based online survey. Depending on whether departments entered all data manually or used an existing feature to import denominator data into the national surveillance database, departments were separated into different groups. Selected survey questions differed between groups.Results Of 1,346 invited departments, 821 participated in the survey (response rate: 61%). Local IT deficits (n = 236), incompatibility of import specifications and hospital information system (n = 153) and lack of technical expertise (n = 145) were cited as the most frequent reasons for not using the denominator data import feature. Conversely, reduction of workload (n = 160) was named as the main motivation to import data. Questions on data availability and accessibility in the electronic hospital information system (HIS) and options to export data from the HIS for the purpose of surveillance, yielded diverse results. Departments utilizing the import feature tended to be from larger hospitals with a higher level of care.Conclusions The degree to which digital solutions were employed for SSI surveillance differed considerably between surgical departments in Germany. Improving availability and accessibility of information in HIS and meeting interoperability standards will be prerequisites for increasing the amount of data exported directly from HIS to national databases and laying the foundation for automated SSI surveillance on a broad scale.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
digitalization
en
dc.subject
surveillance
en
dc.subject
surgical site infection
en
dc.subject
healthcare-associated infection
en
dc.subject
digital infection control
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Surgical site infection surveillance in German hospitals: a national survey to determine the status quo of digitalization
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
49
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s13756-023-01253-9
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
12
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
37208780
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2047-2994