dc.contributor.author
Schmidt, Jacob
dc.contributor.author
Lichy, Isabel
dc.contributor.author
Kurz, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Peters, Robert
dc.contributor.author
Hofbauer, Sebastian
dc.contributor.author
Plage, Hennig
dc.contributor.author
Jeutner, Jonathan
dc.contributor.author
Schlomm, Thorsten
dc.contributor.author
Neymeyer, Jörg
dc.contributor.author
Ralla, Bernhard
dc.date.accessioned
2025-08-05T11:46:30Z
dc.date.available
2025-08-05T11:46:30Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/48574
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-48298
dc.description.abstract
Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly natural language processing (NLP) models such as ChatGPT, presents novel opportunities for patient education and informed consent. This study evaluated ChatGPT’s use as a support tool for informed consent before penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) following radical prostatectomy. Methods: ChatGPT-4 answered 20 frequently asked questions across four categories: ED and treatment, PPI surgery, complications, and postoperative care. Three senior urologists independently rated information quality using the DISCERN instrument on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (poor quality) to 5 (good quality). Readability was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) formulas, and inter-rater reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: The inter-rater reliability coefficient was 0.76 (95% CI 0.71–0.80). Mean DISCERN scores indicated moderate quality: 2.79 ± 0.92 for ED and treatment, 2.57 ± 0.98 for surgery, 2.65 ± 0.86 for complications, and 2.74 ± 0.90 for postoperative care. High scores (>4) were achieved for clarity and relevance, while complex issues, such as risks and alternative treatments, scored the lowest (<2). The FRE scores ranged from 9.8 to 28.39, and FKGL scores ranged from 14.04 to 17.41, indicating complex readability suitable for college-level comprehension. Conclusions: ChatGPT currently provides variable and often inadequate quality information without sufficient comprehensibility for informed patient decisions, indicating the need for further improvements in quality and readability.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
erectile dysfunction
en
dc.subject
penile prosthesis
en
dc.subject
natural language processing
en
dc.subject
informed consent
en
dc.subject
patient education
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
ChatGPT as a Support Tool for Informed Consent and Preoperative Patient Education Prior to Penile Prosthesis Implantation
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
7482
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/jcm13247482
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Clinical Medicine
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
24
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI AG
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
13
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
39768416
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2077-0383