dc.contributor.author
Fahy, Stephen
dc.contributor.author
Niemann, Marcel
dc.contributor.author
Böhm, Peter
dc.contributor.author
Winkler, Tobias
dc.contributor.author
Oehme, Stephan
dc.date.accessioned
2025-07-29T15:41:52Z
dc.date.available
2025-07-29T15:41:52Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/48489
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-48211
dc.description.abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the quality and readability of information generated by ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4 concerning platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy in the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA), exploring whether large language models (LLMs) could play a significant role in patient education. Design: A total of 23 common patient queries regarding the role of PRP therapy in knee OA management were presented to ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4. The quality of the responses was assessed using the DISCERN criteria, and readability was evaluated using six established assessment tools. Results: Both ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4 produced moderate quality information. The quality of information provided by ChatGPT version 4 was significantly better than version 3.5, with mean DISCERN scores of 48.74 and 44.59, respectively. Both models scored highly with respect to response relevance and had a consistent emphasis on the importance of shared decision making. However, both versions produced content significantly above the recommended 8th grade reading level for patient education materials (PEMs), with mean reading grade levels (RGLs) of 17.18 for ChatGPT version 3.5 and 16.36 for ChatGPT version 4, indicating a potential barrier to their utility in patient education. Conclusions: While ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4 both demonstrated the capability to generate information of moderate quality regarding the role of PRP therapy for knee OA, the readability of the content remains a significant barrier to widespread usage, exceeding the recommended reading levels for PEMs. Although ChatGPT version 4 showed improvements in quality and source citation, future iterations must focus on producing more accessible content to serve as a viable resource in patient education. Collaboration between healthcare providers, patient organizations, and AI developers is crucial to ensure the generation of high quality, peer reviewed, and easily understandable information that supports informed healthcare decisions.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
osteoarthritis (OA)
en
dc.subject
regenerative medicine
en
dc.subject
platelet-rich plasma (PRP)
en
dc.subject
digital health literacy
en
dc.subject
patient education materials (PEMs)
en
dc.subject
artificial intelligence (AI)
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Information Provided by ChatGPT in Relation to the Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Osteoarthritis
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
495
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/jpm14050495
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Personalized Medicine
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI AG
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
14
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
38793077
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2075-4426