dc.contributor.author
von Mackensen, Johanna K. R.
dc.contributor.author
Zwaans, Vanessa I. T.
dc.contributor.author
El Shazly, Ahmed
dc.contributor.author
Van Praet, Karel M.
dc.contributor.author
Heck, Roland
dc.contributor.author
Starck, Christoph T.
dc.contributor.author
Schoenrath, Felix
dc.contributor.author
Potapov, Evgenij V.
dc.contributor.author
Kempfert, Joerg
dc.contributor.author
Jacobs, Stephan
dc.contributor.author
Falk, Volkmar
dc.contributor.author
Wert, Leonhard
dc.date.accessioned
2025-07-04T11:38:06Z
dc.date.available
2025-07-04T11:38:06Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/48135
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-47857
dc.description.abstract
Background: Takotsubo syndrome is, by definition, a reversible form of acute heart failure. If cardiac output is severely reduced, Takotsubo syndrome can cause cardiogenic shock, and mechanical circulatory support can serve as a bridge to recovery. To date, there are no recommendations on when to use mechanical circulatory support and on which device is particularly effective in this context. Our aim was to determine the best treatment strategy. Methods: A systematic literature research and analysis of individual patient data was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines. Our research considered original works published until 31 July 2023. Results: A total of 93 publications that met the inclusion criteria were identified, providing individual data from 124 patients. Of these, 62 (50%) were treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (va-ECLS), and 44 (35.5%) received a microaxial left ventricular assist device (Impella). Eighteen patients received an Impella CP and twenty-one an Impella 2.5. An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) without other devices was used in only 13 patients (10.5%), while other devices (BiVAD or Tandem Heart) were used in 5 patients (4%). The median initial left ventricular ejection fraction was 20%, with no difference between the four device groups except for the IABP group, which was less affected by cardiac output failure (p = 0.015). The overall survival was 86.3%. Compared to the other groups, the time to cardiac recovery was shorter with Impella (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Though the Impella treatment is new, our analysis may show a significant benefit of Impella compared to other MCS strategies for cardiogenic shock in Takotsubo syndrome.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
stress cardiomyopathy
en
dc.subject
cardiogenic shock
en
dc.subject
mechanical circulatory support
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Mechanical Circulatory Support Strategies in Takotsubo Syndrome with Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
473
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/jcm13020473
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Clinical Medicine
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI AG
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
13
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
38256608
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2077-0383