dc.contributor.author
Haslberger, Martin
dc.contributor.author
Schorr, Susanne Gabriele
dc.contributor.author
Strech, Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Haven, Tamarinde
dc.date.accessioned
2025-04-03T16:19:10Z
dc.date.available
2025-04-03T16:19:10Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/47143
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-46861
dc.description.abstract
Aims
Research ethics committees and regulatory agencies assess whether the benefits of a proposed early-stage clinical trial outweigh the risks based on preclinical studies reported in investigator's brochures (IBs). Recent studies have indicated that the reporting of preclinical evidence presented in IBs does not enable proper risk-benefit assessment. We interviewed different stakeholders (regulators, research ethics committee members, preclinical and clinical researchers, ethicists, and metaresearchers) about their views on measures to increase the completeness and robustness of preclinical evidence reporting in IBs.
Methods
This study was preregistered (https://osf.io/nvzwy/). We used purposive sampling and invited stakeholders to participate in an online semistructured interview between March and June 2021. Themes were derived using inductive content analysis. We used a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats matrix to categorize our findings.
Results
Twenty-seven international stakeholders participated. The interviewees pointed to several strengths and opportunities to improve completeness and robustness, mainly more transparent and systematic justifications for the included studies. However, weaknesses and threats were mentioned that could undermine efforts to enable a more thorough assessment: The interviewees stressed that current review practices are sufficient to ensure the safe conduct of first-in-human trials. They feared that changes to the IB structure or review process could overburden stakeholders and slow drug development.
Conclusion
In principle, more robust decision-making processes align with the interests of all stakeholders and with many current initiatives to increase the translatability of preclinical research and limit uninformative or ill-justified trials early in the development process. Further research should investigate measures that could be implemented to benefit all stakeholders.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject
early-phase clinical trials
en
dc.subject
first-in-human
en
dc.subject
institutional review board
en
dc.subject
investigator's brochure
en
dc.subject
regulatory science
en
dc.subject
research ethics committee
en
dc.subject
risk-benefit assessment
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Preclinical efficacy in investigator's brochures: Stakeholders' views on measures to improve completeness and robustness
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1111/bcp.15503
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Wiley
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
340
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
350
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
89
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
35986927
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0306-5251
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1365-2125