dc.contributor.author
Laforce, Tara
dc.contributor.author
Bartol, Jeroen
dc.contributor.author
Becker, Dirk-Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Benbow, Steven
dc.contributor.author
Bond, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Dietl, Carl Rudolf
dc.contributor.author
Frank, Tanja
dc.contributor.author
Kock, Ingo
dc.contributor.author
Magri, Fabiano
dc.contributor.author
Nicholas, Josh
dc.date.accessioned
2025-01-15T10:14:29Z
dc.date.available
2025-01-15T10:14:29Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/46253
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-45965
dc.description.abstract
This paper contains a comparison of five modelling approaches for a simplified nuclear waste repository in a domal salt formation. It is the result of a four-year collaboration between five international teams on Task F of the DECOVALEX-2023 project on performance assessment modelling. The primary objectives of Task F are to build confidence in the models, methods, and software used for performance assessment (PA) of deep geologic nuclear waste repositories, and/or to bring to the fore additional research and development needed to improve PA methodologies. This work demonstrates how these objectives are accomplished through staged development and comparison of the models and methods used by participating teams in their PA frameworks. Participating teams made a wide range of model assumptions, ranging from compartmentalized networks to full 3D models of the salt formation and repository. Despite differences in the modelling strategies, all models indicate that salt compaction and diffusion of radionuclides in brine are key processes in the repository. For the isothermal spent nuclear fuel and vitrified waste scenario with multiple early failures considered, all models indicate little of the disposed radionuclides will migrate beyond the repository seal over the 100,000-year simulations. In general, the model output quantities have the largest differences over the short term and near the waste. Disparities between the models are believed to be due to differing simplifications from the conceptual model.
en
dc.format.extent
15 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
Performance assessment
en
dc.subject
Radionuclide transport
en
dc.subject
Nuclear waste disposal
en
dc.subject
Safety assessment
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::550 Geowissenschaften, Geologie::550 Geowissenschaften
dc.title
Comparing modelling approaches for a generic nuclear waste repository in salt
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
100621
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1016/j.gete.2024.100621
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
40
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2024.100621
refubium.affiliation
Geowissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Geologische Wissenschaften / Fachrichtung Geochemie, Hydrogeologie, Mineralogie
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2352-3808
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert