dc.contributor.author
Brala, Debora
dc.contributor.author
Thevathasan, Tharusan
dc.contributor.author
Grahl, Simon
dc.contributor.author
Barrow, Steve
dc.contributor.author
Violano, Michele
dc.contributor.author
Bergs, Hendrikje
dc.contributor.author
Golpour, Ainoosh
dc.contributor.author
Suwalski, Phillip
dc.contributor.author
Poller, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.author
Skurk, Carsten
dc.contributor.author
Landmesser, Ulf
dc.contributor.author
Heidecker, Bettina
dc.date.accessioned
2024-12-20T13:57:25Z
dc.date.available
2024-12-20T13:57:25Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/46070
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-45779
dc.description.abstract
Background: Inflammatory cardiomyopathy is one of the most common causes of sudden cardiac death in young adults. Diagnosis of inflammatory cardiomyopathy remains challenging, and better monitoring tools are needed. We present magnetocardiography as a method to diagnose myocardial inflammation and monitor treatment response.
Methods and Results: A total of 233 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 45 (+/- 18) years, and 105 (45%) were women. The primary analysis included 209 adult subjects, of whom 66 (32%) were diagnosed with inflammatory cardiomyopathy, 17 (8%) were diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis, and 35 (17%) were diagnosed with other types of nonischemic cardiomyopathy; 91 (44%) did not have cardiomyopathy. The second analysis included 13 patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy who underwent immunosuppressive therapy after baseline magnetocardiography measurement. Finally, diagnostic accuracy of magnetocardiography was tested in 3 independent cohorts (total n=23) and 1 patient, who developed vaccine-related myocarditis.First, we identified a magnetocardiography vector to differentiate between patients with cardiomyopathy versus patients without cardiomyopathy (vector of >= 0.051; sensitivity, 0.59; specificity, 0.95; positive predictive value, 93%; and negative predictive value, 64%). All patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy, including a patient with mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis, had a magnetocardiography vector >= 0.051. Second, we evaluated the ability of the magnetocardiography vector to reflect treatment response. We observed a decrease of the pathologic magnetocardiography vector toward normal in all 13 patients who were clinically improving under immunosuppressive therapy. Magnetocardiography detected treatment response as early as day 7, whereas echocardiographic detection of treatment response occurred after 1 month. The magnetocardiography vector decreased from 0.10 at baseline to 0.07 within 7 days (P=0.010) and to 0.03 within 30 days (P<0.001). After 30 days, left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 42.2% at baseline to 53.8% (P<0.001).
Conclusions: Magnetocardiography has the potential to be used for diagnostic screening and to monitor early treatment response. The method is valuable in inflammatory cardiomyopathy, where there is a major unmet need for early diagnosis and monitoring response to immunosuppressive therapy.
en
dc.subject
echocardiography
en
dc.subject
ejection fraction
en
dc.subject
immunosuppressive therapy
en
dc.subject
inflammatory cardiomyopathy
en
dc.subject
magnetocardiography
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Application of Magnetocardiography to Screen for Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy and Monitor Treatment Response
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1161/jaha.122.027619
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of the American Heart Association
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Wiley
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
12
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
36744683
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2047-9980