dc.contributor.author
Proskurnicka, Angelika
dc.contributor.author
Iskra, Mateusz
dc.contributor.author
Wronka, Sylwia
dc.contributor.author
Bakuła, Zofia
dc.contributor.author
Danesi, Patrizia
dc.contributor.author
Farias, Marconi Rodrigues de
dc.contributor.author
Ramos Portilho, Fábio Vinícius
dc.contributor.author
Garcia Ribeiro, Márcio
dc.contributor.author
Rösler, Uwe
dc.contributor.author
Kano, Rui
dc.date.accessioned
2025-01-06T11:01:01Z
dc.date.available
2025-01-06T11:01:01Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/45896
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-45609
dc.description.abstract
Background
Protothecosis in dogs is a rare, yet emerging disease, distinguished by its often-aggressive clinical course and high fatality rate. Our study was conducted to enhance treatment protocols for affected dogs by better understanding the genetic diversity and drug resistance patterns of Prototheca species.
Objectives
To identify species and drug susceptibility profiles of an international collection of 28 Prototheca strains isolated from cases of protothecosis in dogs.
Animals
None.
Methods
Retrospective study. Species-level identification was made for isolates from 28 dogs in 6 countries by molecular typing with the partial cytb gene as a marker. For the determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum algicidal concentrations (MACs), the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) protocol (M27-A3) was used.
Results
Prototheca bovis was the most prevalent species, accounting for 75% (21/28) of the cases, followed by P. wickerhamii (18%; 5/28) and P. ciferrii (7%; 2/28). Of the 6 drugs tested, efinaconazole (EFZ) was the most potent in vitro, with its median MIC and MAC values equal to 0.125 mg/L. The lowest activity was found for fluconazole (FLU), with MIC and MAC medians of 48 mg/L and 64 mg/L, respectively.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
Our study identifies P. bovis as the species that most frequently causes protothecosis in dogs, which suggests the possibility of cross-species infection from other animals, especially cows. Additionally, it indicates that EFZ could be used in the treatment of infection in the colon.
en
dc.format.extent
7 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Prototheca spp.
la
dc.subject
systemic infection
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::630 Landwirtschaft::630 Landwirtschaft und verwandte Bereiche
dc.title
Genotyping and drug susceptibility profiling of Prototheca sp. strains isolated from cases of protothecosis in dogs
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
e17173
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1111/jvim.17173
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
39
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17173
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Lebensmittelsicherheit und -hygiene
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1939-1676
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert