dc.contributor.author
Hohm, Maximilian
dc.contributor.author
Moesch, Simon S.
dc.contributor.author
Bahm, Jennifer
dc.contributor.author
Haase, Dagmar
dc.contributor.author
Jeschke, Jonathan M.
dc.contributor.author
Balkenhol, Niko
dc.date.accessioned
2024-08-13T13:57:11Z
dc.date.available
2024-08-13T13:57:11Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/44536
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-44248
dc.description.abstract
1. While reintroductions of regionally extinct native species usually benefit ecosystems, reintroduced animals often struggle to locate appropriate habitats where they can establish themselves without conflict with humans. European beavers (Castor fiber) were successfully reintroduced to Germany almost 60 years ago and have reached high abundances again. As beavers can damage trees and change landscapes, they are increasingly in conflict with humans.
2. We investigated human perceptions of beavers in Germany using an online survey, as they are an example of a reintroduced species with an expanding population and potential conflicts with humans. We asked participants about their emotions (anger, fear, interest, joy) towards beavers and what they consider to be acceptable beaver habitats.
3. Of nearly 1500 survey participants, 803 (53%) were from the general public, 475 (32%) from the agricultural sector and 219 (15%) from forestry. People in these sectors had very different perspectives: beavers were positively perceived by the general public, but negatively by stakeholders working in agriculture and forestry. Independently of stakeholder groups, we also found regional differences, as participants from Bavaria—the German state with the highest beaver densities—viewed beavers more negatively than those from the rest of Germany.
4. Zoos and wildlife parks, as well as urban and nature conservation areas, were considered to be the most acceptable habitats for beavers, whereas survey participants did not accept private gardens and cultivated areas as beaver habitats.
5. We discuss the sources of negative emotions towards beavers and how ecologically suitable habitats differ from those that appear acceptable by humans. Even 60 years after their reintroduction, beavers in Germany are still being recognized as both a novelty and a nuisance. Our findings highlight the need for active beaver management and increased public engagement to enable positive coexistence between beavers and humans in Germany.
en
dc.format.extent
15 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject
Castor fiber
en
dc.subject
human–animal interactions
en
dc.subject
human-wildlife conflicts
en
dc.subject
keystone species
en
dc.subject
species reintroductions
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
dc.title
Reintroduced, but not accepted: Stakeholder perceptions of beavers in Germany
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1002/pan3.10678
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
People and Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
1681
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
1695
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
6
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10678
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Biologie

refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2575-8314
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert